Showing posts with label female. Show all posts
Showing posts with label female. Show all posts

Saturday, December 2, 2017

COMMON SENSE ARRIVES IN #MeToo



💥COMMON SENSE💥
Arrives in #MeToo Addressing
Predators & Perverts 

Pamela Anderson was recently interviewed by Megyn  Kelley and what she said was so simple it borders well with the wisdom of common sense in the political and business arenas that are being focused upon with laser like  intensity  with the Public and the Press.

Pamela Anderson Reminds Us of COMMON SENSE: Weinstein’s Accusers Knew What They Were ‘Getting Into’ by Going to Hotel Rooms Alone by Ken Meyer | 1:01 pm, December 1st, 2017

“Don’t go into a hotel room alone. If someone answers the door in a bathrobe, leave,” said Anderson. “It was common knowledge that certain producers or certain people in Hollywood are people to avoid, privately. You know what you’re getting into if you’re going into a hotel room alone.”

https://www.mediaite.com/online/pamela-anderson-weinsteins-accusers-knew-what-they-were-getting-into-by-going-to-hotel-rooms-alone/
See Highlights of Interview & Article above Link.

Interesting exchange on the  Article

[Predator & Pervert are interesting words you chose. I think by definition it applies to Congress (Reps - Senators) & Courts (Judges) for usurping the US Constitution's  [natural born Citizen] (ie. Born in the US to Citizen Parents)  requirement in Art. II. Section 1, C-5.

But Voters bear responsibility also

[Pervert']
alter (something) from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended.]

"he was charged with conspiring to pervert the course of justice"]

pred·a·tor

ˈpredədər/

noun

1.

an animal that naturally preys on others.

"wolves are major predators of rodents"

2. A person or group that ruthlessly exploits others.

With 320 million Americans as victims to the assaults of these Perverts & Predators I wonder why more women, (near 60% of population) who by natures design are in much more need of individual  protections and rights, are so non-chalant and quite about it not supporting it but very vocal about sexual harassment these days?

Obama's Unqualified Terms added 70K of debt upon every man, woman, and child in the USA. Talk about selling the children? 😓 If you voted for McCain the same scenario pertains of not being Qualified or supporting an Unqualified Candidate.

I sued them both - McCain first.  Was the only Presidential Candidate in America to do so and may have had the least support of any of the them.

If by supporting those who supported the usurpations, the Lord has Judgement, the labels of predator and pervert might also be applied to every individual voters record.

Wouldn't it be a shock if the Lord came out in judgements against every women supporting these unqualified Candidates against her own children's futures as a predator and / or pervert?

The responsibility and accountability must be shouldered by every eligible Voting Citizen for our Future.

 It cannot rest upon one person as we may start to wonder why what is happening to us is happening. Of course the Righteous are Tried and Tested for Refinement of their own Principles and Accounting of the Laws of the Land and of Nature's God - the Supreme Creator.]

BLESSED IS THE NATION WITH WISE WOMEN!

There are women I've found standing up against hypocrisy and trying to breath common sense into the #MeToo movement.  The courage those women have against their critics who voice opposition to them laced with brutal shame is amazing to me.

Same Shame
The minions tasked against these warriors use all kinds of gender directed shame Like, " How dare you shame a victim of sexual harrassment! " 

Many recess into anonymity that is not unlike those women harassed decades ago claiming they feared not being believed until three weeks before an important Election? IE. R- Moore- Alabama Senate

What seems most dis engenuious to the #MeToo Movement, is that those of real sexual harassment  were ignored and False Accusers find the MSM very willing to Fan-Their-Flame thrower with a Political Motive-In-Mind. How is that a credit to the #MeToo Movement? It's not. It's a dis-service and a calculated abuse. 

Featured Comment:

🚺

Yesterday I was un-friended by voicing a solicited opinion simply because I acted in light of a Witness unheard, ( the Male) and voiced suspect to the situation referred.

The Female Plaintiff charged she had got up to use the restroom at work - a military environment- and accidentally run into a Male- Defendant coming out of his Office in a narrow hallway.

As they bumped she said excuse me, and he related, " That's Ok. Make it a point to scare pretty women"

She was the initiator of the bump by accident she claims. Her offense claims "the comment made her feel weird" and she was unfamiliar with the Defendant prior.

I voiced she was personally assuming she was the subject of "pretty women" and if he'd claimed a point "to scare off dogs" would she have thought that a good or funny thing to say?

Perhaps in the threatening climate men are faced with scaring off pretty women is a self preservation tactic being used to secure the job? Is that necessarily a bad thing?

There was not a single other friend of hers that did anything but validate her claim and pat her on the back. (Male & Female).

Given her Facebook Pictures and the backlash of abuse being called a "Cave Man" I said perhaps  her best bet was a secure all female environment and wondered if she was advocating segregation of the sexes because she just couldn't handle any testosterone in the work environment?

They were enraged to a point of verbal abuse in response to my bringing up that we actually had not heard from him or his side of the events that took place.

 She wrote as if THAT would be a factor in her Female Supervisors support!

The Gender Fight was on using Supervisors and it was clear women are just as capable as men in doing it!

We recall Madeline Albright' s insinuating a Vote for Hillary validates Female and a Vote against invalidates female gender? And Hillary herself used the gender card countless times in an individual characteristic no shame Political Campaign. What's it Teaching?

I was nearly flabbergasted as she related the sexual harassment training that her company insisted upon.

When I objected to the Verbal Assault coming out of the conversation I received a slew of " Oh I feel so Sorry for you. NOT." rebuttals.

I then inquired "Would such have been their advise also to the Plaintiff for being referred in a group as " Pretty Women"?

OMG he referred to you as a "pretty women' to scare off. Fire the sexual predator?

It was then I related most big companies are keeping a watchful eye on their employees Social networking as it represents in their individual capacity a representation for the company.

By that Standard she had really just Red Flagged herself as an employee MOST LIKELY TO SUE HER EMPLOYER and she would be wise delete the whole Post.

Then I was un-friended and she quoted me as being unfriendly to her in not believing there was nothing she related that wasn't true, and his testimony would be the same.

I relate thus episode because I don't think it's sincular in application. I think its happening like an outbreak of a plague. I do not think that False Accusations is going to encourage a Company to hire a Lady.

The more it goes on the worse the Fear-Factor for Companies  hiring Ladies occurs,  and the worse the situation becomes for women in the work force.

It's no doubt a very difficult situation. Feminist seem outraged at any favoritism in the military or business work force towards Males on one hand. The Military has responded by including Females in every way.

Along comes the argument again for Segreagation because women are offended by Cave-Men?

We've all heard " Put Your Big Girl Panties on" , but cash in rewards and fame might  still be a BIG factor as Congress has doled out $17,000,000.00  in hush money for those who took them off in a void of Common Sense.

CRJ

https://www.amazon.com/Taking-Stand-Judy-Cody-ebook/dp/B003Y74JHG












Friday, April 29, 2016

A SPECIAL REPORT: WOMEN - WE are The Majority - Sacrificing Choice, Innocence, & Our Children's Futures

 A SPECIAL REPORT 
___________________
 WOMEN - WE are The Majority -

Sacrificing Choice, Innocence, & Our Children's Future
________________________________


The thought occurred to me that woman are not acting like a Minority in defending the United States Constitution. Our Republic under the U.S.Constitution is designed to respect individual rights. The U.S. Constitution protects Individual rights in a synopsis the Minority is able to stand up against the Majority when specific rights are trampled. Because of the 19th Amendment that gave Citizen's suffrage without regard to sex, sometimes we think of women more as a minority needing these protections adopted in the Constitution.
I've been careening my head and wrestling about the dismal support in general of Woman for the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of President. ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents for some two weeks now. Scratching my head at this and trying to understand it because on the outset women have a great interest in protecting their children in a natural instinct of 'nurturing' that I think should be very friendly to this Core Protection in the Constitution.

Additionally, women very much in a Civil understanding have more experience of being treated as weaker sex, not being allowed to vote, being shunned for divorce or not being given a Choice in many instances of history in the reproductive rights, which should engender a defense for the protections of the U.S. Constitution especially at the Core of it in the Office of President.

This however has not translated into support either by Contributions or readership for which I've scratched my head about until the question was formed: Why? Why aren't woman acting like a Minority any more? And the answer is because they just aren't. The laws have been changed to favor them in almost every perspective and as it happens often the majority gets complacent with their rights because they begin taking them for granted. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has no doubt made great strides in achieving office and made unprecedented roads towards the Office of the President, but she's also made unprecedented roads in sacrificing the Principles of that Office by not challenging Obama's ineligibility which has in fact lead to everything we are going through now that is panning out like a golden road to disaster.

Women's choices are protected in most aspects. They can get divorced and file such as a Majority, most always getting favor in property which also might be parallel the majority filing. There's no CIVIL office they are prohibited from based on gender. They can vote. Minimum wage is the same for both genders.

So what's this thing in my head about so little respect for supporting the Constitution especially surrounding the Office of President in the concern for national security via children and weaknesses in vulnerability of gender in a Minority position?

Well, as I researched this I found the facts don't lie. Woman are a Majority and as such are, I believe, slipping into a complacency of their Constitutional Rights afforded and protected by the U.S. Constitution in their voting block faster then they even can comprehend; even whilst Hillary Clinton is promising the world to women they actually already have it as a Majority.

Perhaps in the hope that the FBI does not handle her choice to change the Computer Server of the U.S. Federal Government to her own private server in the official conduct of Secretary of State? No doubt, the U.S. Government might have something to say about changing their server, but she didn't ask, she just made that decision and I don't think it was in the interest of FOIA or serving the people in a responsibility of that office.Yes, its true women are the Majority.

With the exception of Alaska and North Dakota women are the Majority or equal in every State of the Union and Men are the Minority. Tossing the States whose population is equal, Women are a Majority in the Majority of States.

State by State Gender 2014 Population Distribution http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-by-gender/
FEATURED number of Women in Congress from 2008 to 2016



So my hunch was correct. Women are more to blame as the irresponsible voting block for our National Security breach in the Office of the President. In 2012 Mitt Romney lost the women's vote by 12 points, the largest ever since recording started in 1952 and despite winning the men's vote by 8 points lost the election by 2 points.

Make no mistake about it as an ineligible person in the Office of President has shown  more favorable to open borders that most harmfully leans on women's innocence & children 37%  of all federal crimes in 2014, ruining the American way of life as far as prosperity loading 10 Trillion of 20 on the backs of their children effectively adding 70K/person during the last eight years which is generational theft, favoring weapons sales to Muslim Theocratically Controlled Countries that support Sharia Law that is a known [subjectification of women] in philosophy. Four F16 Fighters, 200 Abrams Tanks [given] to Egypt Muslim Brotherhood, Iran Nuclear Deal releases 100 Billion,  Saudi Arabia 46 Billion, in fact "the volume of major deals concluded by the Obama administration in its first five years [exceeds] the amount approved by the Bush administration in its full eight years in office by nearly $30 billion. That also means that the Obama administration has approved more arms sales than any U.S. administration since World War II."

Of course the Office of the President or person in it cannot be blamed for every kidnapping, every rape, robbery, stabbing shooting or atrocity, however the choice in that Office is indeed responsible for a general course of action that must be weighed in the balance of good for or against the U.S. Picture a ship in the ocean smooth sailing on one side and shark invested waters on the other in the distance - which do you hope to drift toward with the rudder for a nice afternoon swim?

The President signs every Bill passed by the Legislature- Obamacare was one of those needing a qualified President's signature that encapsulated 1/5 of the entire economy. The Office of the President Directs and Commands nearly every turn of the Military and Border Security General Principle of our Nation. It's near impossible to say the Character of a person in that Office is not affected by Place and both Parents, which should be in the BIGGEST agreement with women as mothers.

It also just so happens to be the only Office in our Government requiring the unique qualification of born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - [ natural born Citizen] and in the United States Supreme Court the defining articulation in Case, Minor v. Happersett [No Doubt] those born in the Country of Parents who are Citizens of it are [natural born Citizens].

[At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or [natural-born citizens], as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.]

Oh the irony of the [United States Supreme Court Case] and Decision that defined [natural born Citizen] actually being on behalf of a women-  Mrs. Virginia Minor, a native born, free, white citizen of the United States, and of the State of Missouri, over the age of twenty-one years, wishing to vote for electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, and for a representative in Congress, and for other officers, at the general election held in November, 1872, applied to one Happersett, the registrar of voters, to register her as a lawful voter, which he refused to do, assigning for cause that she was not a "male citizen of the United States," but a woman. She thereupon sued him in one of the inferior State courts of Missouri, for willfully refusing to place her name upon the list of registered voters, by which refusal she was deprived of her right to vote.

So it is a Great Burden of women that they as a Majority have and are sacrificing what is most precious to them., their children and innocence by their confirmation of a Majority and their slothful diligence to these precious Principles.

A Contemporary Understanding of two verses in ISAIAH
The circumstances are very difficult indeed for me to make this egregious report owning to my own heart naturally drawn out to protect women most natural and instinctive, but that protection cannot come  or be placed upon me as to be my own dereliction accept by my silence.

I noticed in the collection of contributions for my own presidential campaign nearly five to one were from males compared to females. 

What can we say after realizing this? Maybe we were not hard enough on you? Maybe we did not teach it well enough? Women today make up half of the entire professional and technical work force in the United States.

Yet men still dominate in political contributions . More women vote, but only about 30% of big donors contributing are women. Understanding this takes on some relevant features such as opinions may stretch:
ie. [ It’s not that women are less willing or less able to give in general. Despite the wage gap, women, across a variety of demographic variables, are more likely to give to charity than men are. Politics is the outlier, with men’s giving outnumbering women’s. A philanthropy researcher offers an explanation: “They give out of more empathetic and altruistic reasons than men do,” said Debra Mesch, the director of the Women’s Philanthropy Institute at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. “Women may not feel that their money in the political arena is going to fulfill those motivations.”]

What?! Really? If women didn't feel that their money in the political arena was going to fulfill those motivations - in reference to empathetic and altruistic motivations of giving, why do more women vote than men? They obviously feel a responsibility to the voting booth. If women have failed to give in Political Campaigns I believe it's because they have not been educated to the direct link in the generals of the three things we have discussed, or.. well let's get to it.

1-The importance of the Constitution in their rights as individuals; 2- crime upon the innocents that can be given a deferred prosecution status allowed by law in the Executive Commander-In-Chief position in not enforcing borders and laws, and 3- the basics of responsibility to balancing a check book for the safety of our future generations as it pertains to our National Debt and the importance of delaying gratification in the spending department.

That's right 66% of women are carrying credit card debt compared to 33% of men. [ Stick to a budget. The easiest way to avoid credit card debt – regardless of your age or gender – is to create and stick to a budget. At the beginning of the month, decide how you’ll spend your money, and stick to it.]

Let's pose the question for women. You can get the belt and those matching accessory earrings  to that outfit or send $25 dollars to your favorite Presidential Candidate which one is more important to you?

Ask the same question to men. You can get the more expensive balls and walk for a round of golf instead of riding or send $25 dollars to your favorite Presidential Candidate?

What I'm trying to point out here is that women have so much more to lose in my biased male opinion that it is beyond making any sense for them to sacrifice one single line of the Constitution, and if they were to sacrifice a line the one of most value and importance to their rights and the safety of their children in indeed is the one I am protecting and standing up for. I am the only one in America to have a Federal Court Record in protecting and standing up for it in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court. A women's world is the quickest one to change as it was the hardest one to get where they have finally gotten to in America and in the Office of the President can that world change the fastest and most dramatically with an ineligible person.

Now you might be saying to yourself that any money you send to me is a waste because of this or that. That's just bull.  If women get together and send me half of what ineligible Ted Cruz has been sent the Politicians in Washington DC will faint!!! Congress would real!!! and I'm thinking we could move the world in ways you have no idea we could, but the most important factors would be those three we discussed.
1- Safety 2- Crime & 3- National Debt -which could very easily lead to WWWIII slaying millions of your sons and daughters and leaving a lot of blood on your hands. No it's not a joking matter.

In my humble service to you, I haven't made a dime in the last 7 years and 15 Cases of law because I've felt it was so important. I hope you know it doesn't make a bit of sense for me to come here and to cuss you out and make you feel bad for not supporting me with contributions in order to get contributions. In this I agree, but in my motivation for doing and delivering the message I have to say it is indeed your Heavenly Father who has seen this and my interest is not in seeing how much or how many contributions I can get, because that is far from the main point of my relaying the message.

 What you do with it is between you and God. I had the courage and love to deliver it.

Let it not come to haunt me in my Eternal Judgement that my care, concern, and love for you my sisters in the USA was not a very high priority. I can only say., please please.. Repent of this which means change your course now. Do not let your hands be bloodied by your own children in this. It is an eternal regret that would be very difficult to bear. To have done harm to the ones you said you loved creates a very hot hell of regret that just a little effort now on your part can soothe in a big way. I hope you will take advantage of that now.

May God Bless You for that courage and may any contributions you make be seen as your sincere protection and interest for those little ones and the Rights you have, as something I am very weak in understanding but whom I trust God knows much better than I- Women. I certainly hope you receive this as as matter of great respect that I have for you.

Sincerely,
CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


















































Tuesday, November 10, 2015

BREAKING REPORT: IN THE NAME OF EQUALITY - Hillary Clinton MARCHING our little girls TO WAR



BREAKING REPORT: FEATURED EDITORIAL THE POST & EMAIL

-IN THE NAME OF EQUALITY -  
Hillary Clinton MARCHING our little girls TO WAR

Hillary Clinton doesn't care about providing for OUR little girls the same safety net her own life was spared, yet she wants to be Commander-In-Chief heading all of the U.S. Military might. She dodged being drafted as a female, because she was a girl who wasn't required by the draft to sign up. So she wasn't a Draft-Dodger, but she certainly dodged a draft based on what she terms now "inequality".

As a Democratic Party Candidate for President I could not believe when Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders was asked about his "Conscientious Objection" to the Vietnam War and that Hillary Clinton wast not asked how she felt about sending our little girls to WAR when she was protected from a Draft based on being a little girl.

Under an EQUALITY  Banner of Military ALL of our little girls 18 - 30 years of age, (especially single or divorced) would be subject to a War Draft. You have to admit that was NOT something Hillary Clinton had to worry about as a little girl, but it is one she is all for TODAY.

How will our little girls grow up? They will undoubtedly suffer pains that Hillary was pleasantly exempted from and undoubtedly basked in the glow of protections afforded her. What seems attractive in Equality sounds very nice when it comes to receiving the same pay, being admitted into the Priesthood of some Church or Club previously exempting women. However, as the October 13,2015 article taken from the very liberal Huffington Post points out, the demands of EQUALITY, are heading for a real disaster for Millennials, who do not even realize Hillary Clinton is marching them to War.

"If the U.S. military prioritizes "true and pure equality," women might eventually have to register for the draft.
So said Army Secretary John McHugh at the Association of the United States Army’s annual meeting in Washington on Monday, reports Military.com. McHugh added that the issue -- if and when it arises -- should be determined by Congress, not the Department of Defense."



THE SHRILL OF POWER 
RUNNING UP HILLARY CLINTON'S LEG

Desperate for voters, Hillary Clinton has made no bones about it- she's female- and wants you to vote to put the first women in the Office of the President who also acts as the Commander-In-Chief of the whole U.S. Military.

The right to vote in the U.S. was considered an emancipation for females in the previous considerations of sex or gender in the 19th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

"The right of Citizens of the United States to vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State, on account of sex. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. "

The 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870. It defined clearly the right to vote to those regardless of race, color, or previous conditions of servitude, stating:

"The rights of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. This gave men who had been slaves, or incarcerated the right to vote regardless of color, but still did not include women as even U.S. Citizens. It would not be until 1920, 50 years later, that women received this Right under the law of our Constitution through the 19th Amendment ratification.

Many thought this was a grievance of inequality and did not understand the protections it actually was affording. It would have been inconceivable for a father to look at his little girl and think about sending her out to have her legs and arms blown off by mortar shells, her teeth knocked out with the butt of a rifle, or worse her "honor", or "maidenhood" defiled in the brutality of war, but that's where true equality is taking us.

In Jakarta Indonesia women recruited for the military are to be virgins. In a May 2015 Article entitled "Why does Indonesia demand the female recruits are virgins?", A hymen test is described as being used to pass the recruits. It is taken very seriously as a matter of "National Security", said Chief Major General Fuad Basya, referring those who were not virgins more subject to what was termed 'bad habits' and said to be warned against in their military and the defense of the country's security and territory being a very high honor.

Still the hymen test was considered by most recruits and doctors to be 'invasive' in the least, embarrassing, and humiliating, even torture said a female military physician that traumatized recruits, as if in the event of war, that would not be the first thing in jeopardy by the enemy in defiance of the Geneva Convention by rogue partitioners.

Women in the United States are not currently required to register for the Draft, but a mother in New Jersey actually sued on behalf of her high-school graduating daughter to change it. "In 2013 the U.S. Department of Defense announced the end of the direct ground combat exclusion rule  for female service members."

The mother stated her daughter was not so much an activist as she was interested in fairness, stating she sure would never have done it. Her daughter did not voluntarily enroll in the military after her graduation either but went off to college to be a vet. We are left with understanding there is a "pretended" equality sought by the majority of women most thinking about wages, and a very small minority willing to put their life on the line in real Equality eradicating the borders of the sexes.

Ask any male how he felt when he was 18 years old, (maybe except Barack Obama based on the abnormalities of his draft registration reported by a law enforcement investigation and the passport break conducted three times by , let's leave the three letter dirty words out of this, and simply refer to John O. Brennan who was then a CEO of Analysis Corp, big contributor to Barack Obama Candidacy, and now heads the CIA not protecting his former employee very well as a witness of the break-in as he was shot in the head sitting out in his car in front of a church )  when he was filling out his Draft Registration Form, about the seriousness of never knowing after that day what day his Country might call him out and put him on a very serous front line of a barraging assaults?

 More importantly ask yourself if your a female between the ages of 18-25, maybe even 30, especially if your single or divorced if you'd respect your Country more for sending you out on the battlefield based on "equality" or if you might feel a little humiliated- traumatized- even tortured by understanding what Hillary Clinton had brought to your world, that she never ever had to face her entire life?
Muammar Gaddafi Libya Primary Leader
1969-2011

After you ask that question Millennials might understand the WOMEN AGAINST HILLARY Movement happening all across America now.

While Hillary Clinton was Senator Clinton, she never cared about equality in sponsoring legislation that would equalize the Draft Registration among sex, but of course she is very enthusiastic amount being Commander-In-Chief and sitting in that luxurious red seat conducting WARS, watching and laughing about it as she did about the unauthorized war toppling Libya's Muammar Gaddafi  which now has become the breeding ground for ISIS. 

The seriousness of Hillary Clinton becoming Commander-In-Chief and almost single highhandedly bringing every little girl in America in a new nightmare and fear of being killed or maimed in war is much more real than the insecurity, and discomfort of a hymen test.

Who can forget the unsavory 12 second reaction caught of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in her contempt of a Nations Leader of over 40 years "We Came, We Saw, He Died" and then laughing ridiculously? Even amongst enemies respect must be shown and that respect is translated to entire populations. This is something especially well known and understood by men perhaps based on the blanket of blood provided in the Defense of this Nation and is never something to be gloated over.



It is a very serious matter and the offense of gloating over a win is an unrestrained emphasis of bad behavior or shrill not to tolerated amongst the bravest warriors or made light of in contempt of courage by troops. I wouldn't tolerate it as President.

THE RISKS OF A DRAFT for WOMEN 18-30

The United States is already on a very real course of collision with Powers that are not fooling around or laughing at the seriousness of stability for great populations and civilizations with the economy and security concerns of Nations that much of the peace in the world may very well be jeopardized with in the near future.

Hillary Clinton even as a Candidate for President has already called for essentially what would be a collision course with Russia calling for a no-fly zone in Syria that would undoubtedly conflict with Russia's Air Force staging effective sortie. Obama even called the misdiagnosis a hiccup by Clinton spurred by "political motivation" much like her narrative to the General Public differed in the Benghazi Terrorism attacks linked with her tenure as Secretary of State on 911 and the information related to other heads of states as nothing to do with a video tape which we all learned from the release of her emails in the latest Benghazi hearings was politically motivated.

What this translates into or means is that Hillary Clinton will do anything and everything to hide, conceal, and distort the very real ramifications of what she has used to propel her politically upward. Once she is there, our Nation could face a real crisis of Reality to the Equality Question. Hillary has demonstrated a sever distortion of judgement in many and repeated instances when it comes to our Nations security.  When will the 19-25 year old women feel "Hillary's equality" and wish to God they had never voted for her? It is much more likely that they will feel it on the Battle Fields of War then in their Purse over a wage equality.

That day might be the day they are called to register for the Draft under Hillary Clinton who decides that WWIII is a casualty she wishes on her Report Card and that she won't be around as President to have to explain anyway, as millions of our little girls are brought home in caskets or are maimed beyond recognition with their face crushed, their arms and legs blown off in the direct FORCE of EQUALITY?

How do you like Hillary Clinton now? How is the equality working out for you in the seriousness of your vote in the coming 2016 Democratic Party Nominating process Iowa, New Hampshire, and even the General Election if Hillary gets the nodd from the Democratic Party?

My own feeling is that I am losing as a Democratic Party Presidential Candidate. Hillary Clinton leads followed by Senator Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Governor Martin O' Malley. The call for a women to be President is not something that I would not applaud under the right circumstances in our future, but it is not Today to someone who has skirted in her legislative applications, and danced away her National Security collateral in so many instances including not supporting the Constitution's demand for a [natural born Citizen] ie born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents in the Office of the President as I have spent the last seven years fighting for.

Democrats since 2008 have been on a downward spiral unparalleled in the political races of our Country. It is not even stretch of anyone's imagination.
The REAL DANGER of voting for someone based
on a physical description or outward appearance or
characteristic instead of the Heart or what's inside

The Republicans have ridden Barrack Obama like a horse about as far into the sand as they could possibly ride him while the Democratic Party has kept its head in the sand about anything that pertained to Barack Obama's ineligibility.

It might be that Obama has been protected, but at what cost?

And at what cost will our children pay for the misguided, misidentified, misfortunes, and miscalculations of those who have aligned themselves by pretended circumstances of pity, support, and government dependency?

America is in Crisis. We have got to get her back on track, and while I'm running for President and many think it has just been because Obama was not eligible following my hard work in the some 14 Cases across the Country including 2 United States Supreme Court Cases, my greatest concern, is our children and the future that they will face.

We all are indeed little children inside. I'm still a little boy inside holding the door open for my sister and being considerate for girls. If being a gentlemen has become so foreign in the United States that we all cannot recall why our girls haven't been required to sign up for a Draft in a hot war, then I'm very much afraid the reasons preventing such are also disappearing and we all will learn first hand.

As for my recommendation I do not think things should be equal accept for the opportunity. We should not Draft our little girls. It should be a voluntary enlistment that is held in a very high criteria. That criteria that I would consider would include the willingness of any recruited voluntary female soldier to willingly use sex as a defense for any of her male soldier counterparts in the field of danger or to necessitate their release or capture. That might be a little different then Jakarta's because of the use and dedication of her entire body no different then would be expected from any male counterpart.

That would meet a significant standard of equality in the field in my consideration. Those unwilling to meet that standard I would not consider willing to give all as their male counter parts are.

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.