Obama, Visibly Shaken,Laments Lies Are Whats Worked in Washington - Background Checks & Natural Born Citizen Demand

Obama, Visibly Shaken, Laments Lies Are Whats Worked in Washington - Background Checks & Natural Born Citizen Demand

Obama visibly shaken by the defeat and abandoned support within Democrat party for his policies of anti-gun legislation mirrored today by Sen. Harry Reid as "anti-gun", lamented today in regard to the Universal Background Check legislation that pro gun lobbyist flat out lied about what was in this bill.

Obama insisted that a "minority" in the U.S. Senate blocked "common sense gun reforms" in the face of general support.

Check out the grimace of VP Joe Biden's if you want to know if Obama is visibly shaken?

Is it possible that Obama is more angry about someone else getting away with exactly what he got away with in the common sense directive for a natural born citizen to be required for the Office of the President? That he has lied about his eligibility, lied about being a natural born citizen, lied that he was "qualified for the Office" and insisted that everyone go along with his lie or face harsh penalties?

Obama touts 90% of Americans supported the bill for Universal background checks but a minority of the U.S. Senate blocked it. Well, didn't about 40% of Americans vote for the U.S. Senators that blocked it? How can Obama claim 90% of Americans wanted this bill when the people they elected voted against it?

He says 90% of Americans support legislation that makes it harder for a "dangerous person to buy a gun", but isn't someone who usurps the Presidency, who isn't qualified for the Office of the President either by birth or by having two citizen parents at birth both of which are required by U.S. Supreme Court statute, a real dangerous person?

Isn't someone who would hand-out fraudulent long form birth certificates as credible identification, someone who lied about going under the alias of Barry Soetoro to the Illinois State Bar and thus had his law license revoked a pretty dangerous person?

http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video.html?freewheel=90119&sitesection=theblaze&VID=24743813


What makes a dangerous person dangerous is the lengths at which they are willing to go to in order to cover up their own lies and when it comes to Obama we have an unparalleled national security threat and a very dangerous person who is using "Sandy Hook" victims parents of the slain to pass legislation that discourages further lawfully qualified people from getting involved with self-defense and active participation in gun ownership.

Obama says his legislation targeted "convicted felons, people convicted of domestic violence, and those with severe mental illness" A "narcissist" is someone who desperately needs other people to validate their own worth. It includes lying and delusions.

Isn't lying about who you are, about where you were born, using a false social security number, about the very identity documents state and federal agencies use to determine who someone is in the first place the definition of a pathological or congenital liar - a very dangerous person?

90% percent of Democrats voted for the legislation and the 10% of Democrats who didn't won't be invited to the White House for ice-cream. How does Obama think Sandy Hook could have been prevented when the assailant didn't subject himself to a background check and stole the guns? Why does Obama parade Sandy Hook victims around as if this legislation could have made the difference?

That is a lie and a falsehood itself. The only way you could possibly do that is by confiscating the guns of a whole family if but one of their members were mentally ill. That would dis-arm a majority of Americans and Obama isn't stupid he knows how to lie very well.

Obama you'll notice continually advocates "A Majority Rule" accept when it comes to himself. When it comes to himself, he wants a "Minority Rule". Now our Constitution advocates " A Supreme Law of the Land", we are a Constitution Republic, which means if the majority happens to be wrong, say in the case of a "mob rule mentality" which can happen very easily, that the Law can protect the minority from the majority.

Minority folks should take real notice here of Obama's avocation that the majority rule. It is all together evident here that Obama cares less for minorities then he portends.

“Instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill…[they] claimed it would create a ‘big brother’ gun registry,” Obama said. He said the “pattern of spreading untruths” about the legislation served a purpose: to enrage a vocal minority of gun owners.

So what purpose did Obama's lie serve about his not being qualified for the Office of the President? To destroy the Constitution? To destroy the foundation of our society? To dis-credit the integrity of the very backbone of our Country?

He said the opponents of the amendment had “no coherent arguments” about why it should be harder for criminals and those with mental illness to buy a gun,yet clearly doesn't see his fraud and the forgery on his birth certificates as criminal or the result of deeply disturbed mental dis-order?

I mean what do you do with that? Its a complete break down of law and order and the very foundation of speech in being able to possible understand each other. We understand a natural born citizen is a greater requirement that is only insisted upon for the Office of President and Vice President because the power of the executive branch is not divided into 100 as it is for the U.S. Senate or 435 U.S Representatives in the U.S.House.

We see in our Constitution that the qualifications for being a U.S. Senator and a U.S. Representatives are unique and different then the qualifications for President, so why does Obama hold himself as qualified with forged and fabricated birth certificates and a father who never was a U.S. Citizen?

How in the world does the United States Supreme Court sleep at night when the argument has been placed before them in Judy v. Obama 12-5276? Documents filed in court found here for those interested.

If the media is going to take up arms about the Gun Lobby lying along side Obama, isn't it time that we start with the guy in the White House showing some integrity about who he really is, and admit he's not qualified for the Office according to the Constitution?

“All in all this was a pretty shameful day for Washington,” Obama said, “I see this as just round one,” he continued. I have news for Obama, Washington has not had a un-shameful day since he moved in the White House when it comes to integrity towards the Constitution; the law, they've all sworn oaths to.

If Obama continues to press his luck in advocating the demise of the Constitution he won't make the end of his second term before the American people catch on and just get fed-up with the lack of integrity.

Expanded back ground checks for gun owners is a national gun registration much more so than being born outside the United States and being a citizen of Jakarta, Indonesia and a British Subject as Obama is, makes you a United States Natural Born Citizen qualified for the Office of the President.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: Code4Pres Cody Judy

Boston Marathon TWIN Bombing Foretold to Media and Authorities - They Failed to Respond to the Warning

In a major press release going out to some 150 news outlets and political organizations ALL OVER THE COUNTRY the ominous character of the Boston Marathon twin bombings, as it is being related to which also invokes memories of the Twin Towers on 9-11, was related six days prior to its happening in the following blog post dated April 9th, 2013, but none responded.

Here was the POST APRIL 9TH
[Had a dream last night that I used my cell phone to call 911 twice on two separate, but related incidences, on a robbery and authorities would not respond. Left me with an ominous feeling and I thought this morning when I woke up that it was as bad as authorities not responding to Obama's fraudulent identification and non-natural born citizenship status. When the law fails us we are alone in times of trouble. When the people we have entrusted to enforce the law fail to do so, the law indeed has become corrupt. Its a bad feeling and a tragic societal suicide that comes in ObamaQuake. I just have a bad feeling we're headed for a pit of hell unparalleled in our Country.

It seems troublesome at best especially in the wake of this news about such gains with the Dow also touched a record intraday high at 14,716.46

In the past whenever I've dreamed of a cell phone its signified for me that I was pretty tuned in and receptive to what was about to happen. This accompanied with the two repeated 911 calls lets me know their is a BIG lesson headed (my) or our way perhaps the authorities haven't even seen coming?

You know I wouldn't wish it on anyone but I know when our Government aligns itself against the Constitution, somethings going to give and I don't think its going to be the Constitution that carries so much valiant blood with it.]


Of course the two related bombings have reminded all of us of 9-11. I specifically stated "two seperate, but related incidences" in relation to the 911 calls I had in my dream.

We also understand that gold plummeted losing $40 in a matter of minutes near 6% while the Dow dropped 155 points at 11:50 AM EST in direct and stark contrast to the April 9th report. Of course 1% of the total Dow as far as a loss could be considered a quiet robbery authorities didn't respond to.

For me this is a very close fulfillment of prophesy on what was "About to Happen" even as that specific was also related one week prior. Of course many details will be coming forth but it was very interesting to find out that an actual bombing drill coincided with the explosions.

If mother nature was in the same respect harmonized as with "authorities" conducting a "bombing drill" the exact same time in the exact same place as 2 real bombs are going off, then when we have the BIGGEST earthquake drill April 17th,2013 here in Utah, we should certainly expect a real Earthquake to happen... right?



If we look for "false" that is exactly what we will receive. If we look for "Truth" aren't we more likely to find it? So the choice becomes yours and what you want to receive.

I relate the following YouTube Video really as evidence of this Bombing Drill taking place at the exact same time that the mainstream media is not reporting thus far at all.


As I related also April 9th,2013, I wouldn't wish it on anyone. My greatest sympathies accompany the injured and dead of this horrific event. This loss is certainly being felt all over America in many related ways both directly and indirectly, but no where does it hit home more devastatingly then to those who have lost a loved one. This is heart wrenching.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY CODE4PES

ObamaQuake is Coming

Had a dream last night that I used my cell phone to call 911 twice on two separate, but related incidences, on a robbery and authorities would not respond. Left me with an ominous feeling and I thought this morning when I woke up that it was as bad as authorities not responding to Obama's fraudulent identification and non-natural born citizenship status. When the law fails us we are alone in times of trouble. When the people we have entrusted to enforce the law fail to do so, the law indeed has become corrupt. Its a bad feeling and a tragic societal suicide that comes in ObamaQuake. I just have a bad feeling we're headed for a pit of hell unparalleled in our Country.

It seems troublesome at best especially in the wake of this news about such gains with the Dow also touched a record intraday high at 14,716.46

In the past whenever I've dreamed of a cell phone its signified for me that I was pretty tuned in and receptive to what was about to happen. This accompanied with the two repeated 911 calls lets me know their is a BIG lesson headed (my) or our way perhaps the authorities haven't even seen coming?



You know I wouldn't wish it on anyone but I know when our Government aligns itself against the Constitution, somethings going to give and I don't think its going to be the Constitution that carries so much valiant blood with it.

Response LTR to Dinesha D'Souza's Director/Writer of Obama's America 2016 response to Cody Robert Judy request.

Dear Mr. D'Souza:

Thank you so much for your response. That is very appreciated and very kind of you. I look forward to seeing "America" and was very happy about your great success on "Obama's America 2016".

When I took my Mom to see it and we walked out the "somber mood" was palatable of the packed house. Its a real shame that the RNC and their candidate Romney didn't/wouldn't support the USC in the eligibility demands of our USC that Obama clearly fails. In 2008 I sued Sen. John McCain also as a Pres Candidate and served the RNC Chairs and McCain 3 days before he made the nomination.

Running as a Democrat in 2012 I sued Obama all the way through the N.H. and Georgia State Courts to the U.S. Supreme Court culminating in Judy v. Obama 12- 5276. It was just sad that nearly 60% of Republicans did not believe Obama was a NBC but the leadership refused to get behind efforts like mine in the Congress as well as support in front of the Courts.

When McCain landed U.S. Sen. Res. 511, the second Congressional Act of his own murky citizenship defying natural law, the deal was struck with co-sponsors Obama and Clinton on the non-binding senate resolution 511 and Obama's path was paved by both R's and D's.

Listening to your CPAC speech, I agreed. The Lion Tamer "Obama" is weaker then the Lion "The American People", but arousing the facilities of the Lion and presenting a legal path responsible to our Republic in the Constitution's Law has all but been bulldozed and disregarded in both parties.

In rewarding the *spirit* of entrepreneurship in your new movie "America" remember, the only defense for America is the United States Constitution. No other law exist as the Supreme Law of the Land and without the foundation of the "Natural Born Citizen" = Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, as the national security demands in the Office of the Pres, and President George Washington and the Chief Justice John Jay agreed, there is no resolution to foreign heads of states taking the U.S. Military and thus The People. Its that important!

The founders of our Nation wanted a nation for everyone, where ones status of birth would not limit their ability to succeed in almost any task that they could set their hearts and minds too. This is what your new movie is about no? Yet, they had put pen to paper to set aside only one aspiration from all citizens and to reserve that for a class of citizens whose members are called “a natural born citizen,” demanded for only the office of the President and Vice President of the United States of America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8&list=PL42539C3948B285D1&index=1



Article II, Section 1

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

Because 1/3rd of our Government rest in one man's hands in the Executive Branch which is the enforcing Branch the military Branch, greater qualification was necessary. Don't you think it remarkable that throughout 237 years and many attempts at changing it the Legislative Branch has held firm in NOT CHANGING IT? It's a legislative mandate, yet it is unenforceable by Congress and the Judicial Branch as a matter of men being ruled by the Supreme law of the Land all have sworn oaths to?

The spirit of America's appreciation for entrepreneurship, over a ruling or elite class, is only managed by the USC's principles. When they are abandoned, America is no better off then any other Nation and freedom and liberty have been chained up and shackled, the light on the hill has been doused.

It is sincerely difficult to be right in the law but helpless to enforcing it when the Courts have turned a blind eye and taken their blindfold off for Obama. I am one who had standing and was severely run over in a hit and run by Obama in the Presidential Race. My record of the events is available in the U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276. It is certainly a travesty to see so many people witness this hit-and-run, and offer no help but simply keep doing what they are doing.

All I have is the record of the incident and recklessness of Obama, but the record is true and correct, and clearly shows he is a usurper. I'm sure you understand a usurper is an illegitimate or controversial claimant to power, often but not always in a monarchy. This may include a person who succeeds in establishing himself as a monarch without inheriting the throne or any other person exercising authority unconstitutionally. It may also be applied to an official acting ultra vires, outside his authority or jurisdiction.

My Best Regards to your future endeavors,
Cody Robert Judy

CRJ PRODUCTIONS
Cody Robert Judy
Ph:
YouTube: CODY JUDY
Project :
I AM YOUR MAN a Movie/Script based on the book TAKING A STAND




Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:42:58 -0400
Subject: Re: I AM YOUR MAN - TAKING A STAND
From: Dinesh D'souza
To:

Thanks so much. I'm working on a few film myself and can't take on additional projects.

best, Dineshá

Republicans & Democrats make Bright Future for 3rd Independent Party

Republicans & Democrats make Bright Future for 3rd Independent Party

The FUTURE is looking Bright for 3rd Independent Party

Constitution Defenders have two extremely bright reports for a 3rd Independent Party rising out of the crisp Constitution burning in the Republican and Democrat Party.

Eric Cantor and Paul Ryan are pretend conservatives with plans to cave on universal background checks.

[The] Republican Majority Leader is leading the charge to cut a deal with President Obama.

The following are just some of the threats to our 2nd Amendment liberties that Republicans are about to shove down our throats:

1.The NRA is cutting backroom deals to centralize gun owner data collection into the Obama/Holder massive government data base.

A centralized system is less costly to fight and far more lucrative for the NRA to appear to be “fixing“.

Like all establishment political lobbies the key to their job security is assisting in making problems they end up being called upon to “fix“.

2. Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor is leading the charge to give Obama and Holder what they want in exchange for appearing to be “fixing” the problem of innocent children being butchered in our public and private schools.

3. Newly appointed Republican Judiciary Chairman, Bob Goodlatte R-VA 6th District, is providing political cover for the sneaky back room gun control deals and gun grabbing sell outs that his political masters - – John Boehner and Eric Cantor – - are cutting with Obama and his corrupt Attorney General, Eric Holder.

4.Political insiders have confirmed Goodlatte earned his brand new chairmanship by ignoring the constitutional demands and grievances of every Republican Unit Chairman in his own 6th district.


5.With Republicans in control of the US House of Representatives gun control legislation is already beginning to see so-called “conservative champions” folding to pressure from the anti-gun media to sell-out gun owners.

6.Former Vice Presidential candidate, Congressman Paul Ryan, has stated that he would support legislation that bans private sales at gun shows.

7.In the House, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, along with the help of Rep. Scott Rigell (VA), Patrick Meehan (PA) and others, have stated openly that they will work together with anti-gun Democrats from Maryland and New York to tighten restrictions on private firearms sales and expand background checks.

8.Possibly even more upsetting has been Senator Tom Coburn’s willingness to work alongside anti-gunner Chuck Schumer (NY) to propose “bi-partisan” anti-gun legislation in the Senate.

Make no mistake, so-called “expansion” of background checks is little more than a blatant attempt by anti-gunners to register all firearms and gun owners in America and that's why the future is looking bright for America's 3rd Independent Party.

I also wanted to publish for readers a consideration to keep in the back of your mind. Its a response from me to an article written by Lawrence Sellins who I always enjoy reading. Here's the article link I responded to and did so because we do need hope and faith in our day that allied to our Constitution our Land can maintain freedom and liberty under the United States Constitution, while providing a place for dreams to come true we don't have to abandon our poor and needy or our elderly and sick.


Written By Lawrence Sellin
http://www.newyorkdailysun.com/obamas-dystopia/1855


Nice article Lawrence, always like your writing style. You know in reading that it makes you wonder about the 2nd Coming of Christ and how exactly Zion will be set up? Christ of course taught Peter and the Church was set up on that kind of a system, all contributing to all and receiving all in a consecration type of 'utopia'.

What it seemed is that you identify "selfishness", and "greed" as values of a whole society unworthy of a "utopia" but exterminating those values wouldn't lead to such; so 'dystopia" is all there is to look forward to or to hope in?

Its a very difficult thing to address but one every great writer should consider. Jesus had a society where all contributed to all and all received all that was needed. The matter was self exposed in the story in Act 5.

What I was wondering or intrigued by is the question in my mind about what you felt was the difference between what your advocating and how Jesus had set up his Church on Earth which then Peter inherited as leader because obviously as Christians we keep that in mind, but you kind of left it out of your article when Christ did indeed have that kind of a system.

With Christ example however it was indeed the Sadducee and Pharisees that wrecked utopia (Zion) and not Christ and I'm not sure why his example is not used in speaking of a perfect society in the positive sense,as "Plato's Republic" to the French Revolution to the "Communist Manifesto" were used as negative notes of failure.

I think if people lose hope in such a system of perfection, Christ certainly would be considered an enemy by supposed Christians upon his return, wouldn't you?

Of course barring in mind when an elected Legislature betrays the system of checks and balances meant to keep our Executive Branch in check, I suppose a sign of weaknesses under our American Constitution is understood. As our Legislature or the elected Representatives don't have the collective will to remove Obama as a non-natural born citizen, they invite their own removal and stoke the public perceptions to question.

Certainly is interesting times we live in.

Of course a Christian believe is indeed set up to embrace a King system, understanding that under a righteous King indeed lays a 1000 year Millennium as the Bible teaches if Christians do believe in the Bible's prophesy and have not deposed it to a Dystopia.

Inspiring the balance is probably only achieved by the complete wrecking of what we have known as we well deserve in the sins of pride and greed and selfishness, which ultimately we are seeing.

I hope you will keep the inspired hope alive in your powerful writing, as we as a society and people do need to believe in righteousness and truth.

Of course I know you have blasted both Dems and Rep. in the utter failure of defending our Constitution and ultimately our Constitution which if followed I do believe is a good balance allowing freedom, choice, and defending those rights set therein, and providing a system of charity where Christianities highest principles of grace, mercy, and justice can prevail.

We do need to have a hope of perfection, to maintain a hope in God's Heavens.

Always a pleasure reading your writing.

Cody Robert Judy

More and More people I think are starting to understand that the Republicans and Democrat Centralized Party system controllers have paralyzed our United States Constitution and there's no denying what they are up to.

With both parties unwilling to address the natural born citizen clause of our Constitution and apply it with Obama as not a natural born citizen, there really is no obstacle between breaking up the United States into less then a perfect union. Obama's lack of transparency is even recognized today here with the mainstream lamestream, as MSN covered a Slate article that called Obama's transparency an Iron Wall.

This then defines the place and work for the 3rd party. We all know the other parties will gravitate to what is popularly supported. If the American People will support this effort Obama may be retired much earlier based on the Constitution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac



If your still with me you gotta check out my new song and some awesome stunts I did in the video that included jumping from one train to another!

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY or CODE4PRES

Check out Cody's new song here: I AM YOUR MAN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzoFwprP5is

Hope & Change 2nd Amendment v. Your NBC Family Defense

Hope & Change v. Your Family Defense

An interesting thought has come up this morning with Glenn Beck commentary about the 2nd Amendment which I think is very relevant to the Natural Born Citizen qualification of the Constitution for the Office of the President. Why not just change the Constitution if you think you’re so right?

One of the many wonderful things about our progressive Founding Fathers wanting to empower individuals as Citizens rather than Subjects of the King was that they realized in what can only be seen as a bow of humility toward intellectualism that it was true, they may not have been able to predict problems that may arise in the future for which the United States Constitution was not equipped, so they actually put in a direct way to change the Constitution.
If you thought your idea was so good with the population, and so wildly popular there is a mechanism within the Constitution to change it, and it can be done very quickly! All you need is a 2/3rds vote of Congress.

Certainly with the mainstream media behind the usurpation of the Office of the president by an illegal person who’s not qualified for the Office of the President, the consenting Republicans in office like Sen. John McCain who actually received his “Citizen” status by law when he was 11 months old, and his “Natural Born Citizen” status in 2008 by Non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511 with only one objection by Republicans, and the majority in the U.S. Senate with Democrats, it would be a cinch right?

If progressive Democrats feel the population is so widely for rescinding the Constitution’s unique qualifications for the Office of the President as a “Natural Born Citizen”, which protects by two generations any person from ascending into the White House by the demand of being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, then why don’t they just change it? Why haven’t they changed it so that for instance a young Supreme Leader from say North Korea could copulate with an American Citizen and finance his off-spring to the head of the U.S. Government long before he passes away?

I mean talk about a good idea! If you were North Korea’s new leader and you wanted to get your hands on the U.S. Nuclear Stock Pile, don’t you think that would be a good plan? I mean that’s all you have to do. Just snatch a poor young American Girl and have a baby with her and bam you have got the White House!

As a dictator you’ve got your entire Country paying you directly all the taxes just like the King of England’s subjects whose duty was to come over to America and subjugate the wild young colonialist in America. You don’t have to rely on contributions to your campaign; you just take it from your subjects at whatever rate you feel will do the job.
What is wrong with that idea Democrats & Republicans?

You know one of the really nice things about this? You don’t have Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Lora Ingram, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, John McCain, Bobby Jindal, Newt Gingrich, even Sarah Palin, and not one of the former Candidate Republican stars who ran for President in 2012 like Mitt Romney or Jon Huntsman speaking out against the idea! What could possibly go wrong?

I mean these guys are acting as the best friend of North Korea or Iran’s Supreme Leaders future children. The foreign leaders wouldn’t even have to copulate with the American girl, they could just fly their sperm over here and have it artificially inseminated into the American mother, and bam 9 months later out pops their kid on U.S. Soil, and 35 years later they have their own son or daughter controlling the whole nuclear arsenal of the United States as well as the treasury.

Don’t you think that’s a good idea? Don’t you think that should be a breeze to change in the Constitution with 2/3rds majority in Congress? Look how easy Obamacare passed with a majority in the House, Senate and Obama in the White House. What’s the difference in doing the same thing with the 2nd Amendment if you’re so opposed to an armed American Population? Change it. Change the Constitution if you’re so sure your idea is so good.

You mean to tell me after 5 years Obama can’t change the “Natural Born Citizen” qualification in the Constitution after it has been challenged in Congress with testimony in the Judiciary Committee’s of the House and Senate over and over and over and over as recent as 2000 and 2004?

If you think the idea of requiring a two generation defense in place for the top position of the Executive Branch of our Government and that not doing so is SOOOOO discriminatory that you’re willing to place the entire American Army and the entire nuclear arsenal in the hands of a puppet or subject of the King, then just change it. I’m sure you have the entire population behind changing it, just like you have the entire population behind changing the 2nd Amendment to read “no one has a right to a weapon loaded with bullets”.

Please, let me spell out what a completely asinine paradox this is. It seems obvious but apparently the so called ‘conservative leaders’ don’t get it, so let’s make it very clear okay?

You mean to tell me I’m unreasonable for saying that the “Natural Born Citizen “requirement as a defense of the people from our Executive Branch of Government, meaning a check point of trust by the people from the President, the one guy that controls an entire Branch of the 3 Branches we have in our Government and the one Branch who has all the weapons at its disposal, the one guy who controls the armies of the United States, and has the ability to topple regimes like say Libya, Afghanistan, or in the future Syria without Congressional approval, is something that you would concede on but you want to keep your rifle to protect yourself from a foreign Government invasion?



Maybe you haven’t read the testimonies in 2000 of 106th Congress’s Judicial Committee’s have heard about the really bad idea of exempting the President’s requirement of a Natural Born Citizen, but I have. I can tell you that somehow responsible people with a lot of love for our Country and you personally have made good decisions in not removing that requirement.
I can tell you that it’s really insane, or stupid, or crazy or delusional to freak out about someone wanting to take your rifle while you give the keys away to a dictator that has your own nuclear bomb pointed right at you!
Okay rational hypothetical announcement here coming over the airways with all the major networks covering the President’s press conference:

“My dear sweet constituents who have voted for me time and time again, we’ve come to a road where I just don’t think it’s very good for criminals to to have a gun period. You’ve put me here and it’s been overwhelmingly humbling because, except for the Birthers and their few bastards who tried to take a stand for the Constitution in the natural born citizen clause in the U.S. Supreme Court, for which we know there is a microcosm of support because they are so awful and foul as to warrant extermination, I have made the executive order that I would like voluntarily for anyone who has a gun to place it in their recycle bin this coming Tuesday. Now, I’ve got the drones equipped with a new metal identifying scanner that can actually see into your house and as far as 4 feet below the surface and plain and simply if that drone flys over your house and detects non-compliance with my executive order this Tuesday, we’ll know your planning insurrection and we’ll with the same drone just drop an incendiary device on your house and your whole family will die. There may be a few women and children that die but you must realize we tried to protect you and simply asked you to comply with turning in a piece of garbage. So it’s really you who killed your children and wife by not complying and if you care so little about your children and wife as to not turn in a piece of garbage, all of society will know your not rational and must be a terrorist. In fact all of your children and wife are probably just as dangerous as you if in hearing this message they don’t turn you in before Tuesday. Now, I’m sorry to interrupt your programming please enjoy the rest of your evening and don’t forget to send me $3 dollars for my Executive Order “Americans for a violent free America.”



This is principally the way the proponents of the 2nd Amendment are seen by the Obama Administration and a good reason to draw attention to it. Why would the Government care about your rifle when they have a nuclear weapon ready and pointed at your head and your entire family as hostages? Don’t you think you’d give up your gun for your children, your wife, your brother, your sister, even your parents?

So the question is who wouldn’t give up their guns for their family? And, how easy would it be to declare those who wouldn’t give up their guns for their family probably not rational people?

Let me just say how much I know and appreciate those who have stood up to Obama and his not being a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the president. I know they actually love you, love our Country, and love freedom and liberty.

It speaks volumes about someone willing to take a stand against such odds in the political arena. It speaks volumes for someone who realizes that in protecting the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution for the Office of the president, and its intentions of 2 generations as a defense for the people,born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, that they have the best interest for your family at hand.

If you find a politician willing to fight for your family like that and defend your loved one, I’d think that was a politician that was worth keeping around. It would just make sense.



Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: CODY JUDY - CODE4PRES
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
www.codyjudy.us

Judy v. Obama 12-5276 - Letter to Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Rep Bob Goodlatte

Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for U.S. President 2012, 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite 2
Ogden, UT. 84401
Ph:
codyjudy@hotmail.com
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
- - - - -

Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681

(Confirmed by phone: Bob Goodlatte Office received this Fax by office secretary 'John' at 1:56pm MST Feb.20th,2013.)

Re:
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION BY THE U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE REGARDING EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF, AND EVIDENCE OF MANIPULATING CASE JUDY V. OBAMA 12-5276 OUT OF THE CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES MAKING THE JUSTICES CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF THE CASE.

Dear Mr. Goodlatte: 02.19.2013

Thank you for your sincere attention in what I believe to be the most serious breach of security between the two branches of Government (Judicial and Legislative) our Nation has ever faced in its history.

As a Presidential Candidate in the Democrat Party of 2012 I submitted evidence through the court system until finally reaching the SCOTUS in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that showed not only does Obama violate constitutional presidential eligibility law as a natural born citizen, but he helped hide multiple vital document forgeries, of a “birth certificate,” Selective Service registration and stolen Social Security numbers- all well documented, via official law enforcement professionals as well as private investigations.

Let me say I am aware that in on May 5th,2009 that you co-sponsored H.R. 1503, which was a bill that would require future presidential candidates to provide proof of citizenship by submitting copies of their birth certificate and I’m also aware that on Feb. 11,2013 Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. filed a complaint with your office regarding quite the same thing as I am submitting. Of course by the mouth of two witnesses with separate instances but in similar contextual circumstances, a serious warrant of investigation should prevail in the Judicial Committee, as well it should, even loosely based on the Congressional Research Committee’s Jack Maskell (CRS’s ) memorandum Video 1 Video 2 that was a misleading manipulation to Congress members regarding this defense requirement of “natural born citizen” vs. citizen. ( SCOTUS Minor v. Happersett ) I would think this would be particularly alarming to Congress?

The dismissal of the many complaints filed in the Courts in 2008 to 2012 was primarily because of lack of "standing” and every court ducked the substantive Constitution demand reasonably based on this important and necessary principle of law which is also a modern day tested and tried Legislative Mandate. However, since my case totally satisfied “standing”, much more sinister and corrupt action has been perpetrated upon me, and I feel the Justices as well.

I believe the Judicial Committee in the House is the only place that serious investigation can be afforded and undertaken that might inform and enlighten the Justices themselves of what is or has happened in their own Court and with their own law clerks as subversive towards their appointments. It’s a well known fact 60% of Republicans & Independents are in favor of this, as well as 25% of Democrats. Ultimately hearings I believe would do more to unite the country publically as education dispels ignorance.

Why are we to assume that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices have removed themselves so far away from Justice that they are willing to be complacent in the face of crimes? Would they really risk their own impeachment? For heaven’s sake, this fact alone testifies very soundly to you that the allegations myself and others are bringing to the committee are true and far less important issues have been undertaken by the Committee.

In my case overwhelming and never refuted evidence shows Barack Obama using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Sworn affidavit of Chief investigator of special Investigations unit of the U.S. Coast Guard shows Obama using a forged Selective Service Certificate and multiple experts, including over 2600 hours of law enforcement professionals, showed the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate to be a forgery.

Obama’s personal attorneys submitted a new copy of the birth certificate, which according to experts represents a forgery of a forgery, which was made to minimize the white halo effect around the letters. This white halo effect created by computer manipulation made the initial forgery released on April 27, 2011 a complete joke. Is this really what our Government has come down to Sir?

For four and a half years now in spite of multiple legal actions, not one single judge or jury ever saw an original 1961 birth certificate for Obama, original selective service certificate or original SS-5 application for the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which Obama claims to be assigned to him. Obama has committed a crime in stating he was a “natural born citizen” on his candidate form violating the 2 generations protection of birth and citizen parents. The manipulation of two different certifications of eligibility is public knowledge. Undeniably, with the Democrat Chair signature affixed to both they are in fact testimony certifying this.

Due to lack of any original identifying documents on Obama and a mountain of evidence showing the alleged copies to be crude forgeries, it is safe to assume an investigation based on Obama’s own covert actions with his identity is warranted. He in fact warrants and clamors his own investigation Sir.

We have a documented citizen of Indonesia Barry Soebarkah, aka Barry Soetoro as the person claiming to be Barack Obama using forged and fraudulent forms of I.D., who is usurping the U.S. Presidency.

If we do not hold ourselves accountable to law in the identity documents from the beginning of a person’s life, giving more credence to respecting the craftsmanship of forgers and their work, based on someone’s adult life, we simply encourage and are complacent with false identities paving the way for the cover up of virtually any crime committed by any bodied person.

As a candidate for President my constitutional rights have been violated by Barack Obama. His assent to the Office has victims of the perpetration of his crimes, and you are hearing from one of them right now. The morality of law is to protect the innocent not to defy justice. If I cannot run for President with the same set of rules against other candidates, the constitutional boundaries and qualifications are of no effect.

If any nefarious foreign dictator can mate with a U.S. Citizen and the child be considered a “Natural Born Citizen” eligible for the U.S. President, the two generations natural defense has in fact broken down to one generation defeating the whole purpose of that national defense. The child can be financed by foreign government to the Commander-In-Chief of our military. That is why in Minor v. Happersett it was stated that if someone was born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents there have never been any doubts to that person being a Natural Born Citizen, but to anything less there have been doubts.

It is up to you; I’ve done all I could. I ran in for U.S. President in 2008 and sued McCain for the same thing because he was given his “Citizen” status by an act of Congress as well as his “Natural Born Citizen” status, which fit into the “naturalized” category rather than the “natural or nature “category. I relate to this as an important factor simply because it dispels any contradiction that I have acted on some other factor other then the Constitution’s principle.

I have been true to that principle regardless of party, and it’s up to each and every American to fight this criminal enterprise ruling the country and regain some decency and some constitutional and civil rights. If you do not fight for our rights, the ruling criminal enterprise will take away more and more of your rights until Congress itself is defunct or released. Then, you would be like me having nowhere to turn for justice. Your hands will be totally tied.



Conclusion:

I’m sure we agree when those influential in places of authority have shirked their duties perhaps passing it on to the higher court to avoid the spotlight, regarding the qualifications of the Office of the President demanded by law. If the cover-ups in the Judicial Branch’s highest court could be essentially run by Clerks averting the Justices, without a spot-light to dispel the corruption, evil days loom ahead for America unparalleled, and the whole purpose of the lower courts deferring to the higher courts in important national security issues is lost to appeals only granted by the lower courts and then appealed by the Government.

This in fact leaves the whole country vulnerable to lack of courage rather than courage.

If there is no light where justice should shine in the halls, but only darkness just think about the invitation of nefarious darkness outside the parameters of the so called “place of justice”?

I as a plaintiff, as well as others and their attorneys, are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s parade and use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.

My case is not a paid case, but is filed on the grace of informa pauperis which I feel is indeed a great responsibility to me to see to it that justice is sought; for it is the people that have granted this opportunity to me in supporting the Constitution.

It would absolutely shock you as to what I have experienced at the United States Supreme Court level with the Clerks, which I reserve for testimony. Suffice it to say I have never received proof of any of the times I’ve been there that an actual Justice signed an order or heard my case in conference which has been represented to the public as being heard and denied.

I think the only way this loop can be closed is by a sincere investigation by Congress.

Not addressing this represents a gross maleficence against the United States of America and people of the United States of America.

Respectfully submitted
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY - CODE4PRES