I-CPAC AMERICAN 2014 Moment - Just what would you like to say to the GOP?

I-CPAC AMERICAN 2014 Moment - Just what would you like to say to the GOP?
FEATURED EDITORIAL at The Post & Email

Like a “candid camera moment” or a ‘Precious Moment”, Cody Robert Judy candidate for President created I-CPAC AMERICAN 2014 so that you could tell the GOP just how unhappy you are with their “conservative” stand on ‘principles’ of the Constitution.

Cody as a Presidential Candidate in 2008 took Obama, and America’s most unpopular U.S. Senator according to a recent poll by Fox, Sen. John McCain to task in 2008 for not being a ‘natural born citizens’ having been born as a native son of Panama and being naturalized 11 months after his birth by a Congressional Act, and then receiving his ‘natural born citizenship’ from his good ole boys club in non-binding U.S. Sen. Resolution 511 in 2008 sponsored by none other then Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama, which he also took to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 in 2012 and 2013 without so much as a hearing.

Its understandable then that Cody has actually stood fast upon the principles of the Constitution wherein only a ‘natural born citizen’, born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, was qualified for the Office of the President. Mr. Judy has stood up time and time again asking Republicans to hear his case in Congress presented with the evidence of professional law enforcement witnesses in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, which many of the courts deferred the issue to on the basis of the political question doctrine.

This year Sen. Ted Cruz spoofed Obama on his “not even a smidgen” comment about the IRS really not targeting Tea Party Groups, and conservatives in general, to that of "Nixon's I'm not a crook" then launched into actually calling for a ban of the IRS in his key note address at CPAC .

In the following “moment” at the Independent Conservative Political Action Conference, Cody Robert Judy fired right back at Sen. Cruz for not using his bully pulpit to actually stand up and defend the real principles of the Constitution that outline the qualifications of the Office of the President, easily discerned as the most powerful position in the Constitution being referred in 13 pages of the 48 page Constitution’s pamphlet dwarfing any other right or institution in comparison.

While “National Security" served Obama as a favorite excuse for virtually all of the scandals coming out of Washington DC, including the spying being done on all Americans Sen. Cruz remarked about telling everyone ‘to keep their cell phones on’ so Obama could hear him during his CPAC address, Obama’s lack of qualification is the one scandal that turns the “national security” issue against Obama, but Republicans have refused to hear the case or take it seriously.

Sen. Ted Cruz himself has denounced his Canadian citizenship in the understanding that dual citizens cannot run for President, but he has yet to have the character to support the Constitution in calling Obama on the carpet for his utter usurpation of the Office of the Present, or seemingly recognizing he himself is not qualified for that particular office. While we admire many of his tactics of standing tall as a Senator in filibustering against the debt ceiling raise, and Obamacare, he has failed indeed to recognize the 'root' of those problems in Obama's qualification and identity scandal.

America does not need a President who does not have the character to take a stand for the Constitution as it is in his oath more so than any other office to protect preserve and defend the Constitution. Cody has demonstrated that and is looking for your help and support because if you choose to continue to support candidates who continue to sweep this dirt under the carpet you are likely to see the blessing of this great Nation continue to diminish with debt and a loss of standing in the respect of the world along with the freedom’s and liberties that have made America the beacon of the light for all to witness as such a unique and creative experience and opportunity.

Cody is running for President but really needs your help for he can’t do it alone, but he has in a non-partisan way stood up for the principle that so many have called ‘unimportant’ not recognizing the disaster in the White House that has played out the last five years in scandal after scandal without any responsibility. Isn't it time you at the very least expect your leaders to stand up to the fraud, forgery, and deceit that Obama's identity crisis represents?

So, sit back and for 2 minutes enjoy this I-CPAC American 2014 Moment. We encourage everyone to make their own video’s and they are welcome to use the Independent Conservative Political Action Conference logo at the top if they would like to in saying just what’s on your mind to the GOP.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VU5S7_asIyo




I-CPAC American Moment (speech)2014
I can tell you the Office of the President is entirely about character. You have to have courageous character to uphold the truth, you have to have brave character to uphold principles. The GOP talks a good game, but you know as well as I do they are nothing but lame.

I’m tired of giving Republicans a chance to be ‘conservative’. I’m tired of giving them a chance to uphold the principles of our Constitutions. I have a message for them.

If you can’t see the conservative principle of seeing to it our President is a natural born citizen, you have no business in the conservative crowd.

If your ideas of a smidgen of character includes covering up the long form fabrication associated with the piece of paper Obama handed out to the press in the White House press core room, your understanding needs an adjustment of the word “smidgen” of character.

I hope Senator Cruz that you have the character someday to take a stand for the identity crisis America faces with Obama. You know he has a long form fabrication for a birth certificate, you know he has a mis-matched social security number , and you know his draft registration has a fraudulent stamp on it.

So what aspect of character calls for the repeal of Obamacare? The character that says Obama is not qualified to sign any law into existence and accordingly Obamacare is not a legitimate constitutional mandated law that has been signed by a qualified President.


How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more then a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

CASTING STONES IN GLASS HOUSES -Is the Well-Spring of Lies surrounding Obama’s Identity leading to Death and War?

CASTING STONES IN GLASS HOUSES

CASTING STONES IN GLASS HOUSES
Is the Well-Spring of Lies surrounding Obama’s Identity leading to Death and War?

FEATURED EDITORIAL at The Post & Email

Many have postulated why I ran/am running for President without having been elected before to a political office as a sign of grandiosity or delusion of grandeur. The very same people often refer to Barack Obama/aka Barry Soetoro as “President Obama” whilst he has not even satisfied the requirements of qualification in the Constitution demanding the Office of the President be filled with a natural born Citizen.- born in the U.S. to Citizen parents. Any election held in violation of the Republic for which we stand is non-binding and the results a usurpation.

For such who claim the law but deny the particulars of the law, the mirage of the law is something they see but is not there, and thusly they are bound in the Soetoro hallucination themselves. The facts are Obama was not born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents and he certainly wasn’t elected on the truth of who he is. Like the fabrications of photo shop, the model doesn’t have all that is in the picture.

A Birther takes risks in popularity- to that most can agree , but leaders are often not the subjects of being popular from behind as leading tends to authenticate. There is no doubt that to claim the title of being a Birther, you must question the very identity of that person who sits in the White House or in my case also to attest those persons who are candidates who are not qualified for the Office of the President but take no thought in repeating a lie and taking the money from you as a contributor.

If you ask directly all those who are popular would be candidates now, you will see them shrink in fear at risking that popularity. Ask Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, Mitt Romney, John McCain, Chris Christie, Jeb Bush, Hillary Clinton, Marco Rubio, Jon Huntsman, Rick Santorum, Bobby Jindal, Rick Perry, if their popularity means more to them then telling the truth about the greatest American case of deception understood in Barack Obama’s identity and the fraud, forgery and deception that has been sold as a bill of goods to the public?

They will cower in fear and defer the question to what stands as the truth in the eyes of the Media rather than taking a stand to the Media and delivering that truth for the Media as a service of being a leader. This is probably the biggest dis-service of leadership in America at this time.

Now the biggest question arising from such behavior, and this is not a belief it’s a behavior, is when it contradicts the truth isn’t that’s the sign of delusion, and can America afford it any longer? What one needs to consider in answering the question is the wages of lies? Ask yourself how can lies and the attrition of truth lead to death and war and are we not watching that actually play out in Crimea Ukraine?

Ideas like the American opportunity, creative capitalism, liberty, freedom, property rights, reaping what you sow, representation in our taxation, individualism, and a small Federal Government designed within the frames of our Constitution actually are symptoms of, not the standard of truth. So when all these symptoms start to fail us is the root not found in the web of lies?

After awhile it’s easy to do. Tell a lie- get the money, and money is power. It allows you to advertise, get more contributors, tell the lie more often- get more money. It happens so efficiently one begins to question whether the positive incentive to tell the truth is worth anything and whether the prospects of lying don’t hold out much more gold in the political arena.

The principle or product of truth is peace, and so that has been my reward in defending the Constitution’s demand for a natural born citizen in my non-partisan actions against McCain and Obama in 2008 and 2012. When it comes to a constant battle in war, peace is looked upon as the serenity of balance one longs for.

If you look at the prospects for President in 2016 how many of them haven’t been sucked into the lie that Barack Obama/aka Barry Soetoro the Kenyan Born master of deceit who handed out his long form fabrication to the most privileged of reporters in the White House Press Core room April 27th 2012 after the popularity of his fraud begin reaching critical mass so much that Donald Trump’s ears were tickled with the thought of running for President?
Of course Donald Trump would like to think of himself as the one who edged out of Obama the long form fabrication but truly he was only the tip of the sword. It was you. Remember nearly 67% of Republicans at the time didn’t believe Obama was born in the U.S., and the number of Democrats was even gaining steam.

Remember this was before Andrew Brietbart’s March 1st 2012 untimely death as well as Lori Fuddy’s. Both died of some sort of natural heart arrhythmias, and both had really what amounted to key elements of Barack Obama’s identity at their disposal.

If you recall Brietbart uncovered or revealed Obama’s Kenyan birth according to his literary agent’s resume that had been changed multiple times without changing Obama’s birth place although Brietbart news went to great lengths to exclude Andrew be called a Birther, and Lori Fuddy the deceased December 11, 2013 Director of the Hawaii Department of Health who had the keys to Obama’s/Soetoro’s birth record in Hawaii was the only one to die after a plane crash with a mysterious diver propping up her foot in the water as new pictures show in the crash link.

I want to recommend you reading the article published today at the Birther Report "Yea That's the Ticket" written by Linda Jordan because it is poignant research on the lies that all these very elect people running for President are purchasing and thus representing to you.

What foreign secretary William Hague said was the greatest crisis of the 21st Century is playing out in Crimea Ukraine and what are the lessons that we are learning from what we are watching when it comes to deceit and lies? "The world cannot just allow this to happen," he said.


1) While Russia’s President Putin doesn’t acknowledge the current President of Ukraine he didn’t have any hesitation in obliging the invitation by the Crimean government who requested Russia’s help, as did Russian puppet Yanukovych. Third invitation, acting president Sergey Aksyonov, asked Putin for help in maintaining peace to come in to maintain order? Yes, we can’t forget Russia was invited in by the very same government who ousted their President who fled to Russia. So how in the world can Russia’s sending troops in be seen as an invasion? Did our leaders and the press suddenly forget about the invitations?

2) Why would Russia invade a country without a designation of their troop’s insignia? Why were the troops sent in unmarked as far as being Russian? Was this intended deceit by Russia or an attempt to be neutral for appearances sake in a respect towards the invitations of the Crimean Government?

3) Why hasn’t a single punch or stone or shot been fired at Russia’s troops by the “rebels” after all the fires and civil unrest we have witnessed indeed by president Viktor Yanukovych’s riot police? Are we to assume the in-house fighting is more lethal to the Ukrainian people then a 'foreign invasion'? One might think a foreign invasion would bring together a resolve within the people, or is it easier being shot by your own government's police force then it is being shot by the Russian army? That usually seems to be the behavior of civilian’s unhappy right after the Winter Olympics and during the Academy Awards that got canceled by a Russian Broadcaster right?

4) Are we to assume that an entire army in Ukraine is so incompetent as to not risk anything, not a single life in defense of their country and if not, how can America’s forces or aide come to rescue such a completely inept country? The Citizens of Ukraine showed a lot of spine overturning their government,especially the “Heavenly Hundred” - those who gave their lives for Ukraine’s freedom and independence. I would fairly assume the citizens were far from being apathetic now and understand how important it is for each individual to stand for a turn-over of power, but where is the European Union who they wanted to side with rather than Russia?

5) Obama announced today that Russia does not have the right even if they have a substantial interest in Crimea to use force? Would that be along the same lines as Obama’s substantial U.S.A interest in Afghanistan, Libya, or Egypt or Africa? Obama says, “There seems to be an international consensus that Russia has violated international law”, but I think Russia's substantial interest weighs heavily on their border, more so than Libya, Afghanistan,Egypt or Africa did for us where we used force.

So is this a mouse trap for aide for America that is being sold as an invasion by Obama with Sen. McCain and SOS Kerry to take the American eye off of Obama's eligibility with Putin now acting his part?

The timing of the greatest Crisis is also questionable as Barack Obama was reported to have had a 90 minute phone call with Russia’s President Putin and the reported release of the information on Barack Obama’s identity cited by the investigation of law enforcement and investigation agency Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse in March. Have you ever had a phone call that lasted an hour and a half and yielded two sentences from each side?

The thing that concerns Americans more than anything else is something that revolves in the truth setting us free. Its at the core of the Gay and Lesbian caucus, its at the core of the Black and Hispanic Caucuses, its at the core of the Finances of just weights and measurements caucus and for all the caucus of crows. When truth prevails Justice is served and when those in office have perpetrated lies and deceit nothing strikes harder against minorities and all those with a dream of America’s opportunity.

We’ve been told so many lies we scarcely know how to tell the truth anymore, or even face the truth that the very elect have indeed been deceived in Barack Obama/Barry Soetoro as a citizen of Indonesia born in Kenya, born in Hawaii having only the cover of lies and deceit as it serves the purposes expedient for the contribution bucket, and still our own Congress will not officially hear the witnesses or conduct their own investigation for the truth and preservation of our Republic.

When lies become the seat of power, the seat of power will risk all to keep covered that which would expose him. Obama’s first act in office in 2008 was an act of covering up his tail. Why? The problem with it is America just keeps digging for the truth and more and more is being uncovered.

You can spy on us, put us in jail, expose us in all of our weaknesses, but the great tradition of our Constitution has imparted to us an opportunity not only to be diverse and different but to be accepted in the truth of who we are, the way our very Creator made and formed us into the nation on Earth we are if nothing else the distinction of American.

We don’t have the pride for others countries, that of course belongs to those who belong to their country and we respect that in their borders until such time as they should want and invite us, but you certainly can’t expect us to disavow our own Supreme Law of the Land’s requirements for the highest office of the land for a two bit liar; Birthers have and continue to do no such thing.

The truth is Barack Obama/Barry Soetoro was not elected. If the fraud and forgery and deceit had been known before hand and everyone had the opportunity to know about it, he would not have managed his way into the White House. Thus Barry Barack Obama Soetoro is not the product of an American election, but the product of a fabricated election just like his long form birth certificate, and draft card were fabricated. You cannot call legitimate that which has been the height of fraud and in such an act of usurpation.

Yes, he has shown it was possible, but where is the honor in that? There is none accept in the histories or Hall of Shame in Hell. Of course the problem is that little concept of “If I go down I’m taking you with me”, again not a noble concept. Its an anti-Christian concept, or in other words the exact opposite of what Jesus Christ did for Christians or those who would call upon his name asking for forgiveness that he suffered, bled and died for.

This is the national security danger that Barack Obama/ Barry Soetoro poses in the office of the White House. He has the ability in his current position to tell our armies to ‘stand down’, something we saw in Benghazi. That’s not conspiracy any longer. He has the ability to mobilize our armies removing heads of states without Congressional approval something he tested and did in Libya. That’s not conspiracy, nor is assuming that with the course of Obama’s past he isn’t willing to start a major escalation in the world to avoid uncovering his biggest fraud, the one the Media is also hiding but just might be ready to tell.

You remember the last time anyone got close to Mr. Obama's identity you recall right after he delivered to the press that long form fabrication, May 1st,2011 Osama bin Laden came off the ice, got dumped in the ocean without so much as a DNA test in a quick 24 hour turn around, and we lost Extortion 17 17 chinook helicopter went down with all 38 dieing just three months later. They say SEAL Team 6 had a target painted on its back since it became known through various Obama administration leaks to the press that the unit killed bin Laden three months earlier, but whether from the gold team or the red team depending on your insider knowledge, the loss of life and the stage cannot be undone, that loss of life is unforgettable. All of these circumstances did indeed surround Obama's Mayday Mayday Mayday.

One thing is very clear to us, when so many elect people are involved in a cover-up on such a big scale, there is no limitations to the ends they are willing to go to in order to keep it covered up. Our concern is how many more will indeed die at the end of Obama's lie and how long the well-spring of this lie will continue to haunt America with disastrous consequences. One record we Birthers can all be very clear on, not one Birther has killed anyone.

We have appealed through the law and have only asked that the law be considered with all the evidence by the Courts and by Congress.
By the way here are the CRJ Academy Award winning red carpet winners for "Best Dress" at the Oscars.

How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more then a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

LTR: U.S. Rep. Neugebauer Chairman of the House & Insurance Subcommittee of the House Committee on Finance Services

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email

Dear U.S. Rep Neugebauer :

As the Chairmen of either the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations/or/ Housing & Insurance I would think "Insurance" under the House Finance Services Committee certainly has jurisdiction in regards to funding A.C.A., and or Obamacare as an insurance.

I was a write-in Candidate for Pres in 2008 and sued Sen. McCain & Sen. Obama in 2008, I continued my standing in 2012 against Obama running for Pres in the Democratic Party and took that clear to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and 2013. The standing I have to challenge Obama's authenticity full fills all 3 demands of standing, and the Judicial Branch has basically deferred this action to one for Congress. I have maintained my standing declaring for 2016 as an Independent for Pres. (The text of the law suit is here 2012 and here 2013 )

The burden is indeed great for one judge or a panel of judges and I believe should be heard by Congress, but no one has come forward with standing who could withstand the charges of 'racism' spewed by the Mainstream Media, as Donald Trump served to show. That is where my 2008 suit against McCain I filed first comes into value. I stood up for the principle as McCain was not born in the U.S. and need two acts of Congress upon his identity. Each was a process of naturalization clearly a man-made law. The natural born citizen clause never was in doubt for those born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, when it comes to the most powerful position in the U.S. or the world, do you think 'doubts' ought to be recommended? Of course not.

The cost to me has been life-altering over the last 5 years and I have estimated to be easily ######### time & dollars. I owe the people who have contributed to my campaign this as well as myself. I don't like the thought of letting people down, when Obama was not born in the U.S. and his father was not a Citizen, he fails the two prong test. Also, I did not just use my testimony in Court, but submitted evidence of Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse which proved with over 2500 hours of professional law enforcement investigation the document Obama handed out at the White House Press Core Room was a fabrication, his social security card is a mis-match, and his draft registration has a fraudulent year stamp dated on it.

If you were in a political race with someone in your 19th District who had that many shenanigans out right wouldn't you be upset about no one listening and everyone covering it up?

As such Chairmen of the Subcommittee, I would humbly ask you if you would conduct a hearing on the authenticity of the ACA because it was not signed by a legally qualified person in the Office of the White House according to the U.S.C., Art. 2,Sect 1,Clause 5?

With the Authenticity of the A.C.A, proven to the House, reparations made to me by the House that a responsible Court would make and the fact The House is in charge of Finances, the credibility of the charge would be seen in a much greater light by the U.S. Senate when it went or if it went to them before Obama resigned the White House.

The cost of Obamacare is frightening and it certainly is going to cost us all a lot more 1/5 of the entire budget I guess. I implore you to hear my testimony in the subcommittee you chair so I can further brief you on the fact that Obamacare/ACA was not signed by a qualified President. I can call a number of professional/expert witnesses to testify on these facts if you will hear us.

I briefed two of S.C. R Tom Rice's Aides on this also regarding S.T.O.P. and offered an Amendment, but wasn't called back.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
phone # included
email me- codyjudy@outlook.com / or / codyjudy@hotmail.com
Web Site: http://www.codyjudy.us
Blog: codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: Code4Pres /or/ Cody Judy




BREAKING NEWS : Hillary KNEW & Congressional Hearing HELD TODAY on Obama's Overreach & S.T.O.P Res.

From The BirtherReport.com
British Intelligent Officer Shrimpton,( Michael Shrimpton is a barrister, called to the Bar in London 1983 and is a specialist in National Security and Constitutional Law, Strategic Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism. He has wide ranging connections both in Western Intelligence agencies and amongst ex-Soviet Bloc agencies. Michael has earned respect in the intelligence community for his analysis of previously unacknowledged post WWII covert operations against the West by organisations based in Washington, Munich, Paris and Brussels and which are continuing in post 9-11. ) "reported Obama's purported mom was not pregnant in 1961 and that Obama was born in Kenya in 1960. He said Kenya was under British intelligence files and that Obama's father ran guns for the Mau Mau. He then dropped a bombshell claiming the CIA did covert DNA testing on Obama at a fundraising dinner and the test came back with no match to the claimed grandparents. Shrimpton said Rudy Giuliani's people knew and sat on the intelligence and further stated he spoke with Hillary Clinton's people and that they were quite interested."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdKA80vnFwU



How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more then a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

BREAKING NEWS : Hillary KNEW & Congressional Hearing HELD TODAY on Obama's Overreach & S.T.O.P Res.

REPORT ON HEARING TODAY
BREAKING NEWS : Hillary KNEW & Congressional Hearing HELD TODAY on Obama's Overreach & S.T.O.P Res.

From The BirtherReport.com
British Intelligent Officer Shrimpton,( Michael Shrimpton is a barrister, called to the Bar in London 1983 and is a specialist in National Security and Constitutional Law, Strategic Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism. He has wide ranging connections both in Western Intelligence agencies and amongst ex-Soviet Bloc agencies. Michael has earned respect in the intelligence community for his analysis of previously unacknowledged post WWII covert operations against the West by organisations based in Washington, Munich, Paris and Brussels and which are continuing in post 9-11. ) "reported Obama's purported mom was not pregnant in 1961 and that Obama was born in Kenya in 1960. He said Kenya was under British intelligence files and that Obama's father ran guns for the Mau Mau. He then dropped a bombshell claiming the CIA did covert DNA testing on Obama at a fundraising dinner and the test came back with no match to the claimed grandparents. Shrimpton said Rudy Giuliani's people knew and sat on the intelligence and further stated he spoke with Hillary Clinton's people and that they were quite interested."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdKA80vnFwU



The above is reported as not being apart of the Cold Case Posse Report and findings I submitted in Judy v. Obama in the United States Supreme Court Case Judy v. Obama 12-5276, nor what is to be further released in March 2014.

So, what might we expect from our own Government leaders that we present evidence to? Also in The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing today I reported as an announcement on my Feb 24, 2014 Featured Editorial from The Post & Email.

You can watch a report on FOX NEWS from Megyn Kelly on the below listed link, and my comment to her interview with Rep. Tom Rice just below the link.

http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/02/25/rep-tom-rice-proposes-lawsuit-over-obamas-power-grabs#

Megyn's got a good point, whose going to enforce a Judge's order when the Executive Branch is the enforcer., which is why Republicans' can't go half way on this, if they are going to do it, they need to hold Obama to Art. 2, Sect 1.Clause 5 and submit the evidence I have to U.S.S.C Judy v. Obama 12-5276, that includes Obama handing out a professional criminal investigated fraudulent long form birth certificate to the White House Press Core May 2012, Obama's mis-match on social security number, and the evidence of his draft registration being fabricated with a false stamp. If Obama is using every tool available to him, and Congress won't use an "disability impeachment proceeding" according to Amend 14, Sec 3, isn't The House also picking and choosing what laws Obama can get away with and which he can't get away with according to their whims? I have offered my testimony to them because I sued McCain and Obama in 2008, and 2012 as a D Candidate for President, so Megyn don't call me a racist, I stood for the principle and the qualification of the Office of the President regardless of party. Republicans' are wanting it both ways if they can pick and choose just like Obama wants to- We're not fooled. I spoke directly to not one but two of Rep. Tom Rice's Aides and gave a report about the conversation. http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2014/02/announcing-congressional-hearing-on.html

Twitter Trend hashtags
#STOPres #overreach

I mean how much more can the American People stand of this? Are we not really seeing Republicans totally approve of Obama's fraud, forgery, and deceit in his identity documents understood as his long form birth certificate which is proven by law enforcement officials to have been a forgery or fabrication, seeing Republicans give Obama a pass on his mis-matched social security number assigned to someone else, and seeing Republicans give Obama a pass on his draft registration which has a fraudulent dated stamp on it?

Are we really seeing Republicans recognizing ALL OF THE ABOVE, and not holding Obama accountable yet holding hearings on Obama's over-reach as Rep. Tom Rice explains in his S.T.O.P Resolution with 111 co-sponsors?
The President has repeatedly ignored this Constitutionally-mandated duty, to include:
His one-year extension of the “substandard” insurance policies.
His one-year delay in Obamacare’s employer mandate.
Granting deferred removal action to illegal immigrants.
His waiver of the welfare work requirement under TANF.

Okay, combine the grievance of all four claims and add them up, are they half has bad, are they a quarter as bad, are they a tenth as bad as Obama's long form fabrication presented to the American public who voted for some Barry Soetoro and didn't even know it?

How many people are involved in the deception of Obama's long form fabrication? Oh, let's see, every single American who voted for him obviously hadnt a clue to the deception, and every single American citizen who didn't vote for him probably would have liked to see their guy in the White House instead right?

"All of America', Republicans, that's whose been hurt by this usurpation. Please if your going to do anything don't make a mockery of the Constitution by picking and choosing what "parts" of it your going to hold Obama accountable to and sweep under the carpet the qualifications for the Office of the President held in Art. 2, Sect.1, Clause 5, while you try and spot light the fact he hasn't "faithfully executed the laws" according to Art. 2, Sec 3.

I mean what do you expect Obama to do when your reading past the qualifications section "for" him, and stopping and pausing at this section? He's laughing at you!

The abrogated irony of your holding him to the requirements of the Constitution to faithfully execute the laws you pass, is twisted by your conclusions that you even expect a usurper, who you won't otherwise rein in by the facts he's not qualified for the very office mentioned only two sections back, is the hyped champion of dysfunctionality.

However, I do applaud your efforts to at least investigate the fact that if the House brought a suit against Obama, managed standing with the resolution, through the Judicial process in the Judicial Branch that according to my own time-table of having to drag Obama through that same process to the United States Supreme Court from 2008-2013, your might get dismissed by the fact that Obama hasn't been in office for over two years in 2018.

Now if your going to do this, and your really intent on the Constitution over-reach then why not have a hearing on his eligibility or include that in this resolution H.B.442? The House has every right to hold Obama accountable to the Constitution and to hold "Disability Impeachment Proceedings" that then can be sent to the U.S. Senate. Whose to say their isn't a few Democrats who don't want to go down with Obama as being of defending the biggest fraud in American history?

By the way if you'd like a superb detailed report of the hearing check in over at The Post & Email

How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more then a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

ANNOUNCING: Congressional Hearing on Obama's Vexation of the Constitution

FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email

Well you can't say the Republican controlled House of Representatives is not heading in the right general direction, on Obama's over-reach of Constitutional authority, and this in spite of a debt ceiling negotiation where Republicans generally folded and allowed Obama to raise the stakes. Funding a president has and can be used as a tool for checking and balancing of the Executive Branch as a law enforcer, but it seems the Republican Majority in the House may be heading in a different direction, perhaps one might say even in more of judicial direction.

Rep. Tom Rice S.C. Republican has now 111 co-sponsors for The S.T.O.P Act that on the surface is aimed at Obama's over-reach. The move might seem based on sound Constitutional Ideals, but we need to recognize it has just as much political ambition. Indeed if Obama is allowed to pick and choose the laws to enforce Congress has written, the results mirror the Emperor's Edict.

Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga. says Obama has amended, delayed or repealed Obamacare 19 times as of Sep 2013. National Review has it Twenty-Seven. A few hours ago the Kudlow Report has it at 30 in an article Time for a 3 year moratorium on Obamacare.

The political ramifications for example of Obama's ruling by fiat, cut right into Republican's plans to let Obamacare ride out and prove what a disaster it is. Obama reverses that strategy when businesses with their lobbies start cozying up to him asking for or in fact demanding with their political muscle exemptions. When a political strategy to take over the U.S. Senate has been manufactured, tooled out, and planned for years you can't just go start meddling into the strategy of the other team like that, but Obama is doing just that and in his State of the Union address promised as much in stating he would use every tool at his disposal.

Rep. Rice said in a News Max interview Feb 18,2014
"President Barack Obama has launched a "fundamental attack" on the nation's freedom with his overreaching use of executive power — and a new House bill has been designed to stop that"

"When we initially proposed this, the leadership thought it was radical and my response was what we're talking about here is not radical. What the president's doing is radical. He took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, and he's not. He's wiping his feet on the Constitution."

Shannon Bream a reporter for Fox quoted Georgetown University law professor Nicholas Rosenkranz Feb 19th,2014 "I quite understand their frustration," he says, adding, "The president has taken a lot of actions that seem a bit more like writing law or rewriting law - rather than taking care that it be faithfully executed." and she continued , "If a majority of House members support the STOP resolution, it would authorize a civil lawsuit against Obama. In the past, members have had a tough time launching lawsuits against a sitting president."

That hearing entitled,ENFORCING THE PRESIDENT’S CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO FAITHFULLY EXECUTE THE LAWS is being held this Wednesday, Feb 26th, 2014 at the Rayburn House Office Building.

I took an extensive effort to notify by phone two of S.C. Representative Tim Rice's Aides on the standing argument I did possess on Obama's Eligibility as a Presidential Candidate in 2008 and 2012 suing McCain and Obama on the natural born citizen qualification standard that both failed that actually directly was the black plague to my own campaign health and prosperity in 2008, 2012, and 2013 cited in the United States Supreme Court as Judy v. Obama 12-5276

Of course you don't mind getting beat when the playing field is even, but when a candidate like McCain or Obama is allowed to skirt the vary requirements for the Office outlined in the United States Constitution and that is proven in every which way from law enforcement investigations and appeal to Judicial Process, justice is not served but laughed at. The Constitution is not upheld. As Representative Rice poignantly states with Obama, "He's wiping his feet on the Constitution" I might add trodden upon under unsavory hoof.

This is not looking good as far as Republican's up-holding the Constitution's demands for a Natural Born Citizen and Obama's identity usurpation of the Office of the President with a long form fabrication for a long form birth certificate, a social security mis-match on e-verify, and the Cold Case Posse's findings Obama's draft registration is also manipulated making it a fabrication.

One might think with such evidence heard in a Judicial Hearing of ENFORCING THE PRESIDENT’S CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO FAITHFULLY EXECUTE THE LAWS, that the very essence of whose able to be President might become a topic and certainly Obama is hoping, and probably has some cards to play if indeed the hearing blossomed to include his own Constitutional credibility as a qualified person for the Office of the President, but at this time it is looking as if the Republican Caucus is prepared to move on without that deliberation or inclusion.

Like a piece of plastic blowing up under a horses legs in a closed quarter, the Republicans are extremely fearful of taking on that "part" of the Constitution. I keep thinking of Glenn Beck's analogy of the State of the Union and another argument he made "Why does the NFL allow thugs" and stated unequivocally he would fire anyone who worked for him who did what is reported of NFL Star for the Baltimore Ravens Ray Rice.

What I remember most of what Glenn Beck said is he doesn't know when cheering with his kids for the NFL athletes whether to cheer and then add a "Disclaimer" except what they do in their personal lives or what? TMZ Sports released a video of what it says shows Rice dragging a seemingly motionless woman out of a Revel Casino elevator.

All I could think about was wondering if Beck along with all the other Republicans and Democrats for that matter, because let's face it we all live under one Supreme Law of the Land haven't indeed knocked the Constitution out and have been seen dragging it out of the elevator? What am I suppose to tell my kids Mr. Beck, he's good on the field on the Constitution and then put in my "Disclaimer" accept on the qualifications of the Office of the President which he totally knocks out of any discussion and drags out of the elevator?

You know if you wanted to, I don't know, maybe compare victims and violent acts associated with Obama as a usurper and Mr. Rice's actions I think the God you worship in your Church Glenn Beck might be a little disappointed in your idea and balance of justice.

You look at the debt Obama has incurred that is coming down the pike upon the children, you look at all the scandals and blood shed under Obama and your willingness to count his long form fabrication authentic, his draft phony pony a legitimate ride, and his social security mis-match just an accident I'm not sure I could recommend you not be fired or at the very least dragged through the TRUTH you so unapologetically endear.

Getting back to the hearing, yes it is a first step and no don't completely discount a Republican make-over and mushroom of the facts to perhaps go at the heart of Obama's qualifications, if and when its presented in Court. Like any defendant such a King George or Richard Nixon the laundry list in the Declaration of Independence and Watergate Hearings expanded when it came to being written and flushed out.

How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more then a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

Is Hollywood Wising Up to Obama's Wise-Guys Act

Is Hollywood's Wising Up to Obama's Wise-Guys Act

Hollywood's not REALLY different in the TAX LINE but the rich did'nt get rich by Being Stupid except on Obama's Qualifications.


Now the Federal Communications Commission is going to start putting monitors in all radio, television and newspaper stations in a study of how their individual news is reported or under-reported to the public Hollywood has got to be seeing something is amiss. I'll betcha they don't even know about my walking into Clear channel with a check for an advertisement campaign of my small business that included my book, the add and campaign being agreed upon and after two adds running my being called down to the station and handed back my check in a refusal to air my campaign.

Yeah, that happened and their worried now that it could stifle freedom of the press? Forget about the cake-maker who refused to bake a cake for a gay couple getting married who was chastised by a District Court this is a political campaign that painted me as a Constitutional hero they didn't want to run. WELCOME to my world. You know the bad thing about Government regulations is sooner or later you might not have a guy in the House that is to fond of you maybe like the last one was. That is when your policy recommendations and all your contributions suddenly slam into a fire wall.

Hollywood declares good business is good business., so much for those who say they are willing to give a little extra in taxes. You knew deep down it was a poorly written and a very poorly delivered line, as Hollywood got behind Obama and declared they'd just love to give a little more of their income to taxes, but as the debate for House of Cards shows to the Maryland Legislature who provided 31 million dollars for the first two seasons of the wildly popular series House of Cards, the bottom line is they like anyone are looking for a better business deal.

“I am sure you can understand that we would not be responsible financiers and a successful production company if we did not have viable options available.”, was the coded message sent from producers of House of Cards to the State Government. Responsible Financiers.. hummm, that's interesting. Responsible Financiers of what? The Constitution? Obama's ineligibility qualification exemption? Who knows? I love the series!

‘House of Cards’ threatens to leave if Maryland comes up short on tax credits
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/house-of-cards-threatens-to-leave-if-maryland-comes-up-short-on-tax-credits/2014/02/20/bf9a8206-9a70-11e3-b931-0204122c514b_story.html?hpid=z5

Robyn Wright who plays a starring role in House of Cards as Mrs. Claire Underwood was recently quoted as saying its pretty sleazy in Washington DC with media journalist sleeping with their Washington DC insider informants she found in her research for the part.

Taxes considered paid by the Government to businesses by way of tax exemptions is a little like sleeping with the devil and hoping things will turn out ok and on the other side of the table the public has a good idea of what ransom means when their prison wardens walk-in to the Legislative hearings threatening to release violent criminals unless they get a new prisons and more dough.

But not 'wanting' to pay more taxes is a direct violation of what you'd say was a stand for the left leaning liberals. What? That's why when I heard this news about House of Cards, playing their cards for more tax exemption money I thought, 'Way to go! There's the good old competition, just like football in a capitalisim.' You know what Hollywood? The thing is if you keep voting 'liberal' the Government is going to blanket this Nation, so there is no place to go and you won't get out of the country to film cheaper either. That's what Big Brother does if you hire a guy who could care less about the Constitution. "Here I was led to assume, from their support of Obama, that they were standing in line ready to give more?", I'd love to hear Kevin Spacey playing Mr. Frank Underwood in House of Cards say that line!

So what's different with those celebrities who say they are in line to pay more taxes along with Obama, because I think if you take somethings into context, you might just find out the "IF" part, and understand the "IF" part isn't happening.

Will Smith says he's cool with a tax-jack of 30%m but if you read more the criteria is in the "IF", it will keep my country growing. The only thing that's been growing besides taxes is our Countries debt up 7 Trillion since Obama took office.

While paying 1 billion in taxes Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerburg is cool with higher taxes, but wait just a minute, Facebook got a tax deduction for every dollar.

Chris Rock thinks if he pays higher taxes people can have jobs, but its the small businesses that create more jobs than the Federal Government or Big Businesses in America by far.

Matt Damon says he's rather pay higher taxes than see programs cut that are helping kids, but the Federal Government did a study that "Head Start" didn't significantly make a difference after the 1st grade, so without the warrant we can suppose Matt's fine with not being charged so much on taxes.

Ben Affleck said with O'Reilly, said 'His [Obama] major policy goal of changing the tax structure so that the wealthy pay their fair share, to me, is of towering importance. However, Affleck's idea has restrictions because he thought we were just going to go to pre-Bush tax cuts, and it certainly stops with what he can't afford.
"I thought we were just going to return to the pre-Bush tax cut numbers. But, yes, I agree, you and I -- I don't know, you know, what your nut looks like, but I don't spend so much that I can't afford to pay a little bit more in taxes"

Actually when 400 of Forbes list having a networth of over a billion were asked, "“Are you, like Warren Buffett, willing to pay higher taxes?”, only eight responded in the affirmative. Oprah Winfrey, who endorsed Obama in 2008, did not respond. Nor did liberal media mogul Ted Turner. Prominent Democratic Party donors from Hollywood such as Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Barry Diller did not express a view. Philanthropists Bill Gates and Michael Bloomberg — whom we queried repeatedly — refused to comment on Buffett’s argument, even as it became a central part of Washington’s political conversation.

Jay-Z says most people with a conscience are willing to pay more, if it went to the right things, like people in poverty, people who needed it, but I'm getting from him the if doesn't include those who can make more money on the dole then they can working. He also believes in 'transparency' and clear definitions, and accountability, as he says when things don't improve you have to wonder 'where's everything going?'.

The bottom line is all these people if they went out and spent their money themselves could probably create more jobs, and help the economy grow much better than a over baring, high regulating, and growth stopping unconstitutional Government making the people bow down to it, rather then serving it by getting the hell out of the way.

Here's one for him that clearly defines Obama is not a natural born citizen according to the Constitution. The grandfather clause held specifically that those born in the United States who were "Citizens" did not have to be 'Natural Born Citizens' by issuing what is called the grandfather clause on the President's qualification demand, " Or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution"

So the only way you could just be a "Citizen" and still be President is if you were living at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. Obama was not living at that time, but several of our Presidents were.

George Washington was born in Virginia but his parents were both British subjects, making him a 'citizen' but not a 'natural born citizen'.

John Adams second president born in Massachusetts but again both parents were subjects of the British crown.

Thomas Jefferson, third president born in Virginia also a Citizen, but not a natural born citizen because his folks were British subjects.

James Madison, fourth president born 25 years before the Declaration of Independence, James Monroe 5th President born in Virginia 18 years before, John Quincy Adams six President born in Massachusetts, Andrew Jackson 7th President born in South Carolina all were born in the U.S. but did not have parents who were both American citizens at the time of their birth, so they had to use the grandfather clause in order to qualify for the office.

That is why , Or a "Citizen" was used to describe the president's qualifications at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

For those still confused and seeking divination that the standard for "Citizen" and "Natural Born Citizen" were different at the time and are still different in our time, please ask yourself why only the term "Citizen" is written regarding U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators written at the exact same time as the qualifications for President?

A CONSTITUTION RECKONING

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more then a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Contribute for Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

P.S.
I want all to know my desire is simply to uphold our Constitution. It is the law by which I know we all will be blessed against all odds. Now enjoy the new song I wrote, performed, and produced. Crank it up and Enjoy! WHEN LOVE'S IN THE RAIN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stFyfFMQT-M

LOSING THE LADIES- Can the USA Recover?

Featured News Update:
Just a little good news to share: Today approximately 1pm United States Representative Randy Neugebauer of the 19th District of Texas favorited a tweet I sent him with this referenced link: Dividing A Nation - The Republican Roll-Out as Birther Barrage Goes Mainstream. I replied to him how much I appreciated that "favoriting", (cept I think my phone got the closest word to it listed on my spell check..covorting..lol, I'm hoping he knew what I meant)my tweet continued, ' it means a lot to know there are Representatives who care for our U.S.C.'
Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

The second update today, mostly because this post has to do with the "Ladies", I want to give Robyn Wright a shout out today for what she said that Glenn Beck also reiterated on his broadcast this morning.

In her research for House of Cards she mentioned how sleezy Washington DC had really become, and specifically mentioned what a political-sex-trade-for-info place D.C. was stating media correspondents were regularly sleeping with their contacts for info she learned from her research on House of Cards. This is just testimonial evidence of the slime in the sewer, how sad not standing up for principles has become, but mostly how compromised the media has become losing their value along the way. This certainly is in dire need of being restored, but I want to thank Robyn her very brave comment. Truth is not always easy to admit but it certainly does set us free and lightens the load.

LOSING THE LADIES- Can the USA Recover?
The family unit is the core of any successful society, so I think its worth addressing as a core issue politically. Of course we've made some mistakes, but that doesn't prevent us from learning from them making our weaknesses strengths through a little more wisdom and understanding.

Somethings been on my mind and I've been thinking about it for awhile like a little chipmunk you'd watch on the fence post not quite knowing what to do with it. I've had a powerful observation point in a study some might think I'm not qualified to give any expertise upon, but as I've been observing Honey, no one is giving you good advice on a top to bottom self recognition of your character.

I did a little research project called," Why are divorced women losers?". Guaranteed if you google those words the majority of answers you're going to get back are coming from 'women' who are generating an income on 'Divorced Women' from some field they call themselves experts in, and the majority of them are looking from a perspective of your being a loser simply based on who fairs better coming out of a 'Divorce' financially, a year or four years after a divorce rather than focusing on the weakness of your character.

You see those highlighted words, those aren't just highlights of words, those are reading assignments. Here's the advice of 10 year professional divorce coach Claudia Broome in an example of what I'm saying, " “Women can’t bury their heads in the sand and pretend that divorce won’t happen to them. They must prepare for the worst case scenario and hope for the best case! They must do what it takes to protect themselves and they must let go of their idealism believing that they will be married forever. Women must not quit their jobs to stay at home with the children until they they have a post-nup in place.“

What's the point of my telling you something you don't want to hear, or worse yet thinking perhaps a lot less of me in hearing? Well, in one word, "Happiness". Whose your "Divorce Coach"? Is she a women that understands you so well? You know what I'm mean 10 to 1 all those 'little sayings' flying around on facebook are generated by women about how "he" 'should be' and 'what's wrong with him'posted by women who are not self reflecting anything but 'negativity', whining,disgruntled un-lady like qualities of character.

Lots of advice out there by women on how to be a gentlemen, problem is they aren't gentlemen, and your right I will never be a lady. So why should you take any advice from me? Well, any man who can school a women on bras you might want to listen to just a little, and I do have a psychology degree if you must know.

Cody Robert Judy — Original Red EBbra
ebbra.bigcartel.com
The Emergency Bra (EBbra) is a protective garment that can be easily and quickly be used as a gas-mask.
3 hours ago · Like · 2 ·
JoAnne Enlightened Consciousness Dang Cody.. I just got schooled in bras by a guy. Nice one.
· Unlike · 2

To that, I came across some good advice from a Doctor, but it wasn't generated just for women, but I think its really good advice for them:

If your going to find character in a man, you have first got to be able to identify it, and what better way then to identify it in yourself? So, you've decided to enter the business world and become a tycoon. Good for you, but now your faced with another dilemma right? Do you know what that is? Have you ever heard of "Power Divorces"?

Wow! What a surprise to find out “High-earning, professional women are the big losers in the divorce courts", and here's another professional, Brooke Kroeger whose going to tell you why”. The bottom line is when you get married and are successful, it works both ways, as far as the word 'half', or what Brooke called "legal hijinks for women". “‘ My husband gets part of this?’ is a typical question,”; “And the answer is yes.” The best recognition in the article reflects, “But it’s also unromantic to get a divorce.”.

Complaining is synonymous with failure, and guess what? Failure is associated with 'filing for a divorce' and guess whose doing the most of it? Its the same sex whose doing much more of the complaining in the first place. Ok, why not? Let's show you from another expert Cathy Meyer whose going to tell us, "Why Most Divorces are Filed by Women".

So, the answer if you were to become financially successful and independent as a women is the same advice you hate when it's being proposed by a man, " pre- or post-nuptial agreement ", because if someone loved you they wouldn't want one right? Well, the shoe fits on the other foot as, 'If you love him/her, it shouldn't matter' because your going to be together forever right?

Indeed fair minded people understand that marriage is indeed a agreement, and as it goes when its split its a financial agreement so why wouldn't you consider it going into the marriage, when both of you are going to consider it applicable as such if you fly out of it?

But that's not what I want to address in this article. I want to address the character traits mostly associated with divorce. If we don't address those character flaws in you how are you ever going to be successful, which is what I think a "Coach", or "Councilor" ought to be advising. Of course many won't seek counseling for one reason or the other, but the biggest reason maybe someone 'wants' to go to counseling in the 'hopes' of being proved 'right' and he should change 'his' ways...warm?

Two thirds of divorces are in fact initiated by women. That's an incredible number admitting failure in a marriage vow that states : " to be true to you in good times and in bad, in sickness and in health. I will love you and honor you all the days of my life."

So maybe we could figure this out together; self discovery is always the best way to change. What are the character traits needed by both sexes to be true to someone in good times and in bad times, in sickness and in health, and to love someone and honor them all the days of your life?

Its interesting in the study related in the above referenced article "Verbal Abuse", and "Emotional Neglect" are listed as the biggest reasons listed for women to file a divorce between the ages of 40 and 79.

"Physical abuse is easily identified. There is no doubt, once you have been hit, that you have been physically abused. You don’t second guess yourself because the bruises and scars are visible evidence that abuse has taken place. Verbal abuse is different. The damage is internal, there are no physical bruises or scars, just a wounded spirit and sense of self-esteem."

Do you remember "Stick and Stones may brake my bones but names and faces will never hurt me?" Of course unless you let them. No one can take away your self esteem unless you let them. That doesn't mean you have to get even, or let it sink in. That's always your choice. The best advice I received about 'verbal abuse' is 'let it run of your back like water runs off a ducks back". I've found it very necessary and useful advice

"Emotional intimacy is one of the most wonderful experiences we ever have. Nothing else really comes close to the experience of sharing our deepest thoughts and feelings with another, of being deeply seen and known, of sharing love, passion, laughter, joy, and/or creativity. The experience of intimacy fills our souls and takes away our loneliness."

Now when reading those would you guess they were written by a women, because I'm not sure 'emotional intimacy' would be written like that from a man's perspective, but I do know women can identify with it. So, how do I know women could identify with that is a good question, but the better one is why don't women understand that's not the definition for a man? I mean, in a hetrosexual question are you marrying a man or a women?

In honoring a man wouldn't it be more successful for you if you understood his perspective? How does this not involve becoming a "Lady" anymore? You want a "Gentleman", isn't it a pretty well understood theory that to earn one, you have to become the other? So, whose teaching our little girls to be "Ladies", for I see a whole lot of divorced Mom's teaching their sons how to be 'Gentleman'.

I'm not sure of the personal lives of these women I've quoted, but I do know I've been through three divorces and they were all filed first by the female/wife. I also remember I was the one who asked or proposed marriage to them. I've lost three estates, that's not a successful marital or financial record by any means. I have a life-long male friend. We're the same 48 years of age. He's never been married and just last week he was saying to me, there is one word that has prevented me from getting married; "Half".

Well, he doesn't mess around with pinning it down, but at first glance you'd say he's worried about losing his finances right? There is a deeper problem though. Let's go deeper then even your second guess, 'selfishness', right? Yes, lets go to the heart of it "Trust".

Now when women think of a 'trust issue' what's the brain teaser flying around in your head? He's a 'cheater' right? When a man thinks of a 'trust issue' what's the brain teaser more often? Whose doing better five years after the marriage is dissolved if neither have married up the financial chain? The "Trust" for a man is indeed the "Bank", shall we call it "The Family Bank & Trust".

You know there's books that could be written and are written, but the real point I want to make is really a question. How can a women help ease the 'trust uneasiness' of a guy in the understood qualities of a 'Lady'? Buried deep is understanding the differences in sexes in a real general aspect of testosterone, the majority of which has been given to the man in the order of "The Family Bank & Trust".

Women who are not "Ladies" don't understand in the slightest that "jealousy' while painful is quite a temporary while it lies in ignorance. The advice from women in the 1800's was quite different then the advice in the 21st Century, but has that advice really been the best financial advice? Leave because your heart broken he's had an affair?

What part of the trust was broken when he had an affair "Ladies"? A Lady provides every physical need for her Gentleman, because she understands her own "jealousy" does not help increase the bank, and simultaneously‎ understands that testosterone is worth a lot more sticking with him through an affair that your honoring rather than allowing it to deplete and ruin. Allowed to fester jealousy an insatiable thirst that will push a marriage into a bankruptcy or divorce.

Communication is indeed the 'key'. Ladies know how to find out what her man really wants and then to go about providing that. When you provide that kind of 'security' to a man, your worth and value is certainly unprecedented among women. If a man doesn't see that he really is blind. What I'm saying is if you can figure out as a "Lady" how to remove the reasons for a divorce, don't you think your marriage is going to last longer?

Traditionally, a women now days seeks the instant satisfaction of filing divorce. Generally that involves a lack of patience. Patience is a virtue or character trait. Understanding phases everyone goes through and comes out of is a part of being 'understanding' and 'wise'. Again these are character traits of a "Lady". Whose teaching these out of all the Divorce Coaches?

My Mom divorced my Dad when I was four years old. She was a professional women, that had no idea or clue what she was doing to her children in that decision. It was all about 'herself' and 'changing' and 'showing' him. Did she have any idea she was wiping out her children's inheritance for a life-time of work at the time she was filing? No, she didn't, but she does now.

While in todays world the reasons for a divorce have been coached and manipulated by those who stood to gain financially from divorce, lawyers, divorce coaches, even councilors, it is very rare that the character of a "Lady" is respected and honored by all those giving advice.

This has made the value of a real "Lady" something men have almost lost hope in. Indeed, the character traits involved in the following verses describe what all women need to become "Ladies". Why would any women read the following and think it wasn't for her? While this was written quite some time ago, it seems just as true today, and the failures of filing for divorce are easily seen as a lack of honor for 'principles' much more than not being honored. Honor is earned through a life of 'principles', so go out an earn what you think your worth. It really is up to you and what you can show of yourself being a "Lady". When that is held in front of your vision your self esteem is not so shallow but grows deep as a fresh rewarding well of eternal principles.

You've heard it said a little faith can move mountains, well, a women who is a "Lady" can move a man over great distances. Ask yourself where is that advice on how to become and be a "Lady" and where would you go to find such?

Proverbs 31:10-31
10b A wife of noble character who can find? She is worth far more than rubies. (self esteem rising as your appreciated for what?)

11 Her husband has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value. (Trust in the Family Bank based in Principles)

12 She brings him good, not harm,all the days of her life. (She doesn't gossip or back bite him with anyone, and never would think of stabbing in the back with her mouth. She's true to him)

13 She selects wool and flax and works with eager hands. (Humm.. looks like she can still be a professional and work??

14 She is like the merchant ships,bringing her food from afar.

15 She gets up while it is still night;she provides food for her family and portions for her female servants. (If you don't have help in the house cleaning etc., because your poor whose fault is that? What do you have to give that's no skin off your nose?)

16 She considers a field and buys it;out of her earnings she plants a vineyard. (Wow,she's successful in her own so much she's got a little extra to do something for an increase for her family and the Family Bank & Trust)

17 She sets about her work vigorously;her arms are strong for her tasks (Looks like the Gym isn't excluded or keeping in shape)

18 She sees that her trading is profitable,and her lamp does not go out at night. ( Love isn't something that slacks, is lacking in energy or has a headache, ideas to please or protect in a wise way are much easier when you open your arms to include rather then exclude.)

19 In her hand she holds the distaff and grasps the spindle with her fingers. ( Using your head and understanding you can't do it all, is not a downfall, its a wisdom in recognizing facts and getting the help you need)

20 She opens her arms to the poor and extends her hands to the needy. (this is always a wonderful thing to be able to do instead of hoarding with fear that have away of playing their hand out if you are'nt choosing the principles that breed success. Fear most always follows with failure.)

21 When it snows, she has no fear for her household; for all of them are clothed in scarlet. ( Sounds like dressing nice is still in fashion. You don't have to dress poorly to be humble)

22 She makes coverings for her bed; she is clothed in fine linen and purple. (When you act like a Lady you dress like one and a man sure notices)

23 Her husband is respected at the city gate,where he takes his seat among the elders of the land. (Character seems to attract character here)

24 She makes linen garments and sells them,and supplies the merchants with sashes. (Isn't this using your head and using your industriousness as a tool rather than a handicap?)

25 She is clothed with strength and dignity; she can laugh at the days to come.(Interesting that clothing is referred here as character traits. How can you be clothed in 'strength' if your giving into the whims of 'jealousy'? How can dignity come to you if you haven't risen above the call of what most women might crack to because they didn't have the slightest idea of how to be a "Lady"? How can laughter come facing our weaknesses as we laugh at ourselves for silly tendencies that are petty while we are indeed recognizing the sort is increasing your strengths in every field you can possibly imagine?

26 She speaks with wisdom,and faithful instruction is on her tongue. ("Why would anyone get married?" said a great leader of women? Nancy Pelosi - A former Speaker of the House and a Representative? A shocking understanding of the happiness of a family which is the unit of any successful society she admits its because you found someone irresistible and that they had to get married.)

27 She watches over the affairs of her household and does not eat the bread of idleness. (Being attentive to every need requires actually an open conversation of a man's real feelings which you need to be able to digest in fairness. Having it your way all the time isn't really fair right? Ignoring your husbands' feelings is eating the bread of idleness."

28 Her children arise and call her blessed;her husband also, and he praises her: ( The long term is in her sites as well as the short term and you consider this seriously, and find ways to overcome the insatiable negatives that will deprive you and your children of everything rewarding.)

29 “Many women do noble things,but you surpass them all.” (In the long haul, you find what is needed to make it work finding the honor you desire. That brings more self esteem which is a rich reward! Nothing easy is worth much, so honor yourself by honoring your vow.)

30 Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting;but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised.

31 Honor her for all that her hands have done,and let her works bring her praise at the city gate. (Honoring a women for being a "Lady" is very much an earned character that every women can become, and its within your grasps. Make it so with all your decisions. )

So, when was the last time you whispered in your spouses ear?
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

For more articles, pieces, and thoughts Cody Robert Judy has written on dating,relationships,and marriage type those words in the search box located in the top right hand corner search box.


Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

P.S.
I want all to know my desire is simply to uphold our Constitution. It is the law by which I know we all will be blessed against all odds. Now enjoy the new song I wrote, performed, and produced. Crank it up and Enjoy! WHEN LOVE'S IN THE RAIN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stFyfFMQT-M