ENJOY REGARDING THIS STORY "Exclusive CRJ INTERVIEW- GAINING THE EYE OF THE COURT by Sharon Rondeau The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS- U.S. SUPREME COURT CRUZ, RUBIO, JINDAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE RETURNED?
In one stunning and sweeping Motion in the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 U.S. Senator Cruz, U.S. Senator Rubio and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal were squarely addressed with collecting contributions for an Office they are not qualified for. Cody Robert Judy '08, '12 and '16 Democratic Party Candidate for President asked Justice Sotomayer Wednesday in a Motion for the Court to Rule on during the Recess Period of the Court where Active Cases are continued to consider millions of dollars in contributions that are being siphoned off from legitimate Candidates Qualified under the qualifying grounds of the Constitution of the United States pressing the issue that contributions need to be returned or properly administered to Candidates who are at least qualified for the Office of the President according to the Constitution's guidelines of 'natural born Citizen' [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents].
The MOTIONS pivotal statement reads:re: SCOTUS 14-9396 [9- DELAY is detrimental for Petitioner as well as Respondent(s) due in part to the Presidential Election in 2016. Fully six months exist before the Iowa Caucus in January 2016. This case revolves around an interpretation of ‘natural born Citizen’ in U.S.C. Art. II, Sect. 1, Clause 5. , that the Republicans U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, LA. Gov. Bobby Jindal, and U.S. Senator Marco Rubio are in effect in violation of as Candidates for President with no timely recourse or due process available. Without a ruling by the SUPREME COURT, Campaign donations as well as confusion exist among the VOTING PUBLIC. This is siphoning off important support to the Petitioner in contributions necessarily going to unqualified Candidates.]
"I urge people to reconsider these illegal and fraudulent Campaigns collecting dollars without authority under the United States Constitution", said Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy. "These guys", referring to Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal, "no better." They are trying to follow in Obama's wake and People need to understand that it doesn't matter how big a wake is, if its FRAUD its FRAUD. Stating you are qualified for an Office that you are not qualified in the 'hopes' that no one will have the due-diligence or time needed to get to Court for an ORDER to STOP your actions of fraud is like looting a store in a mob type rampage and that's what they are doing!"
"We Candidates for the Office of the President who are qualified under the Constitution of the United States are working very hard in our Campaigns", said Judy, "and there is a limited amount of money out there and a lot of Candidates vying for every dollar. I don't mind those Candidates who are at least qualified for the Office of the President or whatever the Office they are running for, but it is just ludicrous and an outrage to see Senator Cruz go on Nation Programs and in a scathing visceral wipe out the United States Constitution's demands for the Office of the President as if they were the same qualifications set for Senators and Representatives. They are not the same qualifications and Senator Cruz needs to be called on the carpet along with Rubio and Jindal for trying to 'hood-wink' the public out of Contributions. Silence does not give consent, because our Constitution is not silent."
"Perhaps other candidates out of some kind of immoral respect towards the public will keep their mouth shuts, but I won't. My American Parents taught me differently and I have more moral respect and esteem for the public than that. My Motion in the United States Supreme Court, that's something just a little bit higher than the internet Senator Cruz,", purportedly a swipe at Cruz's recent interview with Katie Couric on Yahoo.com News clip featured link- Update: Rush Limbaugh talked about it today also]," named U.S. Senator Cruz, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, and Governor Bobby Jindal for un-american activities in their grab-n-go mugging of contributions with the perceived authority of the offices they hold which really ought to be yanked out from under them by the authority of the Constitution's 14th Amendment Section three which states:
"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of an State Legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
In the strongest language any Candidate for President has come out with as a defense of the public trust on the subject of the violations Judy said, "If collecting money for an Office of the United States of America whilst you are unqualified by the demands of the Constitution for that Office, yet elected and maintaining an Office you are Qualified for, with the tacit implications of authority for the office you are in being considered and used as a tool to convince the innocent victims of your would-be fraud collecting for an Office you know you are not qualified for, with the complicit motivation in your own head that you will not have any authority that has standing come down on you, that constitutes and is a rebellion against your oath, and a rebellion against the People of the United States of America and a Rebellion against the Trust they have placed in you in the Offices that you hold, regardless of your race or religion or gender! It's UN- AMERICAN."
The Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et.al, 14-9396 Case has gone further than any other eligibility principled law suit has gone in the United States Supreme Court. The Docket of the U.S. Supreme Court now shows a 2ND CONFERENCE has been scheduled.
Judy was asked, " Do you see any advantage to and for the Public in this new scheduled Conference? "
" I sure do! Number one, we have been given 'Time', and have NOT been dismissed and have not been denied. The case is wide open again for Amicus Curiae's or 'Friend of the Court Briefs'. Frankly, I think the Court was shocked that Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and even Hillary Clinton have failed to weigh in on this in recommendations in their particular interest of the Case as current and former Presidential Candidates. Without their Legal Analysis placed in the highest Court on this very important and crucial interest, they are basically stating to the Court they don't care if their Campaigns are toasted with an adverse decision. Candidate Clinton is an eligible Candidate, but she is not doing anything to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution in this pivotal and crucial fight on behalf and for the Public Trust and it is certainly a show of incompetence in really what we all must admit is the most powerful position of our Government."
All 220 Law suits with Case Numbers some included in SCOTUS Records were not even considered because of a 'standing' issue either not brought directly by another Candidate for President or a jurisdictional error of not siting the actual Candidate in litigation ie. Many Cases were dismissed because petitioner's took Secretary of States to Court instead of the ineligible Candidate. Cody Robert Judy's Case fulfills both as he has been a Candidate for President in 2008 and 2012 and maintains his rights in the Presidential Field with his 2016 Campaign. Judy also maintains his stand is not partisan politics as he has taken both McCain in 2008 and Obama to task for violating the principle of 'natural born Citizen ie. '[Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.]
Another Campaign Commercial put out by the CRJ 2106 CAMP unfolds entitled: CONSTITUTIONAL RECKONING
UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT
Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D,VA.,MA.,MI., now and one from a U.S. Citizen in the United Kingdom Thank You!
*If there is an UPDATE of ORDERS from the U.S. Supreme Court Today we will update that here.
UPDATE: On the ORDERS LIST of 6-29-15 of SCOTUS there are none for this Case
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us
Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI
It should be Noticed this is an unsigned rough draft of the original Document and the SCOTUS COPY reflects: "Gov. Bobby Jindal & Mr. Judy's original Signature. This has been done as a safety and authenticity measure which has become CRJ common practice DUE to misguided or malicious purposes".
Motion/Application for Time Extension Judy v. Obama 14-9396
Cody;
ReplyDeleteI continue to urge you to Amend your Brief in those portions that attempt to identify the source of the legal status of a U.S. natural born Citizen and confine your support to the Actual Laws of the U.S. as construable from the Preamble, A1S8C4, A2S1C5, the 1790 Act, et seq., and the specific reconciliation required by the passage of the 1922 Cable Act.
In doing so you then REQUIRE that the SCOTUS deny the existence of those Laws or accept them as the controlling legal authority.
Denying them would require the SCOTUS to say that there never was any U.S. natural born Citizens and in accepting them they accept that U.S. natural born Citizens are born to two (2) parents who are each INDEPENDENTLY U.S. Citizens< (since the passage of the Cable Act), within the limits of the U.S., (since the repeal and replace 1795 Act.).
But the greatest argument to accept the Constitutional proposition of law regarding the status of U.S. natural born Citizens is the FACT that doing otherwise insures the status quo because it leaves the interpretations of both Vattel and the English Common Law at odds with the Courts favoring Justice penumbra zone Gray over Justice Waite.
There is NOTHING to loose under my statutory interpretations and EVERYTHING to loose if you choose not too.
SLC
Thank you and I would urge you to Contribute $'s or get your friends to Contribute $'s because you can look up all the legal garb you'd like, and file it yourself.. but without a Presidential Candidate and a Campaign to take to Court to show an argument such as yours, your S.O.L. .. do you hear what I'm saying?
ReplyDelete